On Mon, 15 Jan 2001 09:53:22 -0800, Bruce Edge <bedge@sattel.com>
wrote:
I’ll third the recommendation - I wouldn’t want to live without it.
(It may even be better than “Cats!” )
-The first thing I did when I got NTO was to send mail to perforce
asking for a client - I assume Dean, Bruce, Mario and a whole lot of
others did as well. The REALLY nice thing for me is that you can have
one repository work seamlessly on multiple OS’s and remotely via the
Internet. Now that the NTO client is working I can actually start
doing real porting work.
Thanks for the update Mario!
-Bill
I’ll second the recommendation for perforce.
I’ve used RCS, cvs, and tlib, and I would want not switch back to any of them.
As for the GUI, the Windows based GUI is very easy to use, and also makes
browsing the storage depoy very simple.
There’s also a Tcl/Tk version of the Gui available which lags a bit behind the
Windoze version, but is still very useable, and runs on QNX4 and any other
platform with tk/tcl.
They also have a web interface to the server now.
-Bruce.
Dean Douthat wrote:
Mario Charest wrote:
“Bill at Sierra Design” <> BC@SierraDesign.com> > wrote in message
news:93o45q$rb8$> 2@inn.qnx.com> …
Sorry. I thought is was a source control system.
What is Perforce?
It is a source control system.
I meant to say it doesn’t compare cause it’s much much better >
First it’s based on a server/client scheme. So unlike VSS it will
work across Internet. It’s also MUCH faster since it’s not realing
on file locking. It much more robust. I have often seen VSS corrupted
database on flaky network ;-(
It as bug and job tracking system.
It’s not as easy as VSS though. Takes a bit of getting use to.
I don’t use it myself but people at our place who develop with Visual C++ say
the Perforce GUI client plug-in is very easy to use, maybe as easy as VSS.
Mario Charest <mcharest@void_zinformatic.com> wrote in message
news:93nut7$gq9$> 1@nntp.qnx.com> …
“Bill at Sierra Design” <> BC@SierraDesign.com> > wrote in message
news:93nsk3$n5g$> 1@inn.qnx.com> …
I’ve heard of perforce.
How does it compare to MS Source Safe.
It doesn’t…
Dean Douthat <> ddouthat@faac.com> > wrote in message
news:> 3A5F49DD.E010B4C2@faac.com> …
Good news!
We use Perforce across a number of platforms: QNX4, NT, Linux, etc.
We
find it to be an excellent product – robust and reliable with good
support.
Mario Charest wrote:
I haven’t seen any news about this so I’m taking it upon myself to
announce it >
The SCM Perforce (client) is availabe for QRTP.
http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
PS I’m in no way related with Perforce.
“People looking to serious, should be looking to Sirius”
\
A penny saved has not been spent.