sin gn on qnx4.25

It’s looks like “sin gn” isn’t able to display all globals names (more than
128) on the network.
Does someone know why?

More importantly, is Proc maintaining the list of global names properly.

Try writing a little program using qnx_name_query() and recurse through all
of your names to see if they all come out. If they do, then you have your
fixed version of ‘sin gn’.

If they don’t all come out then you have a bigger problem with Proc dropping
name information. If this is teh case start looking at command line options
to Proc. I see for starters the -n option is the number of names which
defaults to 80.

“Luca Sillari” <l.sillari@prc-el.it> wrote in message
news:ac2d7g$l5u$1@inn.qnx.com

It’s looks like “sin gn” isn’t able to display all globals names (more
than
128) on the network.
Does someone know why?

I already verified that using qnx_name_locate(), I’m be able to find globals
names that “sin gn” wasn’t able to display.
It’s seem that the sin gn shows less nember of gn names the Proc has stored.
In fact if I stop a module that attach a gn name show by “sin gn”, the sin
gn is able to show another name.
Where can I find a fixed version of ‘sin gn’ ?

“Bill Caroselli (Q-TPS)” <QTPS@EarthLink.net> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:ac3cqn$edj$1@inn.qnx.com

More importantly, is Proc maintaining the list of global names properly.

Try writing a little program using qnx_name_query() and recurse through
all
of your names to see if they all come out. If they do, then you have your
fixed version of ‘sin gn’.

If they don’t all come out then you have a bigger problem with Proc
dropping
name information. If this is teh case start looking at command line
options
to Proc. I see for starters the -n option is the number of names which
defaults to 80.

“Luca Sillari” <> l.sillari@prc-el.it> > wrote in message
news:ac2d7g$l5u$> 1@inn.qnx.com> …
It’s looks like “sin gn” isn’t able to display all globals names (more
than
128) on the network.
Does someone know why?
\

“Luca Sillari” <l.sillari@prc-el.it> wrote in message
news:aca35m$615$1@inn.qnx.com

I already verified that using qnx_name_locate(), I’m be able to find
globals
names that “sin gn” wasn’t able to display.
It’s seem that the sin gn shows less nember of gn names the Proc has
stored.
In fact if I stop a module that attach a gn name show by “sin gn”, the sin
gn is able to show another name.
Where can I find a fixed version of ‘sin gn’ ?

It sounds like you just wrote one. Use it.

“Bill Caroselli (Q-TPS)” <QTPS@EarthLink.net> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:acb98j$3fr$1@inn.qnx.com

“Luca Sillari” <> l.sillari@prc-el.it> > wrote in message
news:aca35m$615$> 1@inn.qnx.com> …
I already verified that using qnx_name_locate(), I’m be able to find
globals
names that “sin gn” wasn’t able to display.
It’s seem that the sin gn shows less nember of gn names the Proc has
stored.
In fact if I stop a module that attach a gn name show by “sin gn”, the
sin
gn is able to show another name.
Where can I find a fixed version of ‘sin gn’ ?



It sounds like you just wrote one. Use it.

Unfortunately it isn’t so simple.
I need to have a correct versione of “sin”.
We have module that we can modify that use “sin gn” .
So I can solve my problem having a fix version of sin or having the source
code of sin.
Maybe I can create an alias but I think the best way is to solve the problem
inspite of turn arount it.