Hello,
SO_LINGER isn’t supported? What’s the schedule for this?
SO_REUSEADDR is not supported for UDP (SO_REUSEPORT also doesn’t work).
What’s the schedule for this? If the plan is to include it with
multicast, when will that be?
Thanks,
-david
Tiny or BSD stacks?
chris
David Alessio <david.alessio@hsa.hitachi.com> wrote:
SO_LINGER isn’t supported? What’s the schedule for this?
SO_REUSEADDR is not supported for UDP (SO_REUSEPORT also doesn’t work).
What’s the schedule for this? If the plan is to include it with
multicast, when will that be?
Thanks,
-david
–
cdm@qnx.com > “The faster I go, the behinder I get.”
Chris McKillop – Lewis Carroll –
Software Engineer, QSSL
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Well, the tiny stack is never going to support all the features of
the BSD stack. My guess is that this will be amoung them. So if you
need to use those sockopts move to the BSD stack.
chris
David Alessio <david.alessio@hsa.hitachi.com> wrote:
Tiny.
Chris McKillop wrote:
Tiny or BSD stacks?
chris
David Alessio <> david.alessio@hsa.hitachi.com> > wrote:
SO_LINGER isn’t supported? What’s the schedule for this?
SO_REUSEADDR is not supported for UDP (SO_REUSEPORT also doesn’t work).
What’s the schedule for this? If the plan is to include it with
multicast, when will that be?
Thanks,
-david
–
cdm@qnx.com > “The faster I go, the behinder I get.”
Chris McKillop – Lewis Carroll –
Software Engineer, QSSL
–
cdm@qnx.com > “The faster I go, the behinder I get.”
Chris McKillop – Lewis Carroll –
Software Engineer, QSSL
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<