What are y’all people using as IDE for C/C++??
I can’t get eclipse to work, Is it good?
Has anyone ported and packaged SourceNavigator?
Does anyone know where can I get Emacs?
Can anyone recomend a repository where I can get an IDE?
I have a really slow machine and compiling is painful
Thanks in advance
Workspace is an IDE, and it’s free. Go to http://pages.infinit.net/micbel
Jerry Chappell
“Hugo” <hugoj@nospam.cee.hw.ac.uk> wrote in message
news:abbsqr$106$1@inn.qnx.com…
What are y’all people using as IDE for C/C++??
I can’t get eclipse to work, Is it good?
Has anyone ported and packaged SourceNavigator?
Does anyone know where can I get Emacs?Can anyone recomend a repository where I can get an IDE?
I have a really slow machine and compiling is painfulThanks in advance
“Hugo” <hugoj@nospam.cee.hw.ac.uk> wrote in message
news:abbsqr$106$1@inn.qnx.com…
What are y’all people using as IDE for C/C++??
I can’t get eclipse to work, Is it good?
Has anyone ported and packaged SourceNavigator?
Does anyone know where can I get Emacs?Can anyone recomend a repository where I can get an IDE?
I have a really slow machine and compiling is painful
Not sure what you meant by this statement but and IDE
won’t make a difference speedwise/
Thanks in advance
Thanks for your suggestions, anyone heared of SourceNavigator being ported?
Mario, what I meant is that my machine is quite low in HD space and PII 
so compiling an IDE from sourcecode is difficult, and I was looking for
something
that doesn’t require compiling, something like a qpr package or a
repository.
Do u know of any?
“Mario Charest” <goto@nothingness.com> wrote in message
news:abchgf$e7a$1@inn.qnx.com…
“Hugo” <> hugoj@nospam.cee.hw.ac.uk> > wrote in message
news:abbsqr$106$> 1@inn.qnx.com> …
What are y’all people using as IDE for C/C++??
I can’t get eclipse to work, Is it good?
Has anyone ported and packaged SourceNavigator?
Does anyone know where can I get Emacs?Can anyone recomend a repository where I can get an IDE?
I have a really slow machine and compiling is painful
Not sure what you meant by this statement but and IDE
won’t make a difference speedwise/
Thanks in advance
\
“Hugo” <hugoj@nospam.cee.hw.ac.uk> wrote in message
news:abddno$3vd$1@inn.qnx.com…
Thanks for your suggestions, anyone heared of SourceNavigator being
ported?
Mario, what I meant is that my machine is quite low in HD space and PII
so compiling an IDE from sourcecode is difficult, and I was looking for
something that doesn’t require compiling, something like a qpr package or
a
repository.
I see
Do u know of any?
SourceNavigator was ported by Rennie, (I hope it jumps in), but it requires
lots of ram and a fast machine (it’s really slow).
As Jerry suggested Workspace is probably your best bet for the moment.
Emacs is also available on cogent site (www.cogent.ca) but I don’t know the
exact link.
The Eclipse based IDE comes it may be an option for you, but it won’t be
free
(you didn’t mention if that was a requirement) and will alo required lots of
ram
and a fast machine.
“Mario Charest” <> goto@nothingness.com> > wrote in message
news:abchgf$e7a$> 1@inn.qnx.com> …“Hugo” <> hugoj@nospam.cee.hw.ac.uk> > wrote in message
news:abbsqr$106$> 1@inn.qnx.com> …
What are y’all people using as IDE for C/C++??
I can’t get eclipse to work, Is it good?
Has anyone ported and packaged SourceNavigator?
Does anyone know where can I get Emacs?Can anyone recomend a repository where I can get an IDE?
I have a really slow machine and compiling is painful
Not sure what you meant by this statement but and IDE
won’t make a difference speedwise/
Thanks in advance
\
Mario Charest wrote:
SourceNavigator was ported by Rennie, (I hope it jumps in), but it requires
lots of ram and a fast machine (it’s really slow).
Yes, I have a .qpr for source navigator, and it requires lots of ram and
a fast machine. I haven’t done much with it lately, as I am using
Eclipse (which is much better, but as Mario says is not free).
The repository for source navigator is:
http://developers.cogentrts.com/rallen/repository
Rennie
Bill Caroselli (Q-TPS) wrote:
So are you suggesting that Eclipse WILL work better with a mere 64 MB of
RAM?
Due to the nature of the beta agreement I can’t comment.
btw: I just recently bought a 256MB Registered ECC DDR DIMM for $99.00
at Fry’s (ram sure is cheap).
Rennie
The Eclipse based IDE comes it may be an option for you, but it won’t be
freeWhat if you have a developer’s seat? It would be nice to get something a
little more professional for development considering how much you pay for a
developer’s seat!
Pete Eddy
Waiting Eclipse, Visual SlickEdit (www.slickedit.com) is very cool
!but! not free. Cheap anyway!
Alain.
Hugo wrote:
What are y’all people using as IDE for C/C++??
I can’t get eclipse to work, Is it good?
Has anyone ported and packaged SourceNavigator?
Does anyone know where can I get Emacs?Can anyone recomend a repository where I can get an IDE?
I have a really slow machine and compiling is painfulThanks in advance
Hi Rennie
I had tried Source Navigator. I never got anything substantial to work
because I had “only” 64 MB in my system.
So are you suggesting that Eclipse WILL work better with a mere 64 MB of
RAM?
(It’s disgusting really. I can remember putting QNX, TCP/IP and Photon on a
386 with 4 MB and having it work respectfully. 64 MB not enough! Hugh!)
“Rennie Allen” <rallen@csical.com> wrote in message
news:3CDF75E0.3090301@csical.com…
Mario Charest wrote:
SourceNavigator was ported by Rennie, (I hope it jumps in), but it
requires
lots of ram and a fast machine (it’s really slow).Yes, I have a .qpr for source navigator, and it requires lots of ram and
a fast machine. I haven’t done much with it lately, as I am using
Eclipse (which is much better, but as Mario says is not free).The repository for source navigator is:
http://developers.cogentrts.com/rallen/repository
Rennie
Well your right. But, this assumes that you have a place to plug it in.
“Rennie Allen” <rallen@csical.com> wrote in message
news:3CDFA6E6.2090103@csical.com…
Bill Caroselli (Q-TPS) wrote:
So are you suggesting that Eclipse WILL work better with a mere 64 MB of
RAM?Due to the nature of the beta agreement I can’t comment.
btw: I just recently bought a 256MB Registered ECC DDR DIMM for $99.00
at Fry’s (ram sure is cheap).Rennie
“Bill Caroselli (Q-TPS)” <QTPS@EarthLink.net> wrote in message
news:abp2gr$j37$1@inn.qnx.com…
Well your right. But, this assumes that you have a place to plug it in.
A couple of years ago you had to buy a 10 000$ Sun workstation
to do VxWork Development.
When QNX4 was out a PC with 64Meg of ram and a 386 was
around 2000$
You can get a complete PC that will run Eclipse nicely for 600$
with monitor included. This is just not an issue these days, and
for a company like QNX to develop tools and spend time
making it all fit in 64Meg would be a total waste of time.
When gcc was out I keep on complaining how slow it was,
well I bit the bullet, got a faster machine and moved on 
“Rennie Allen” <> rallen@csical.com> > wrote in message
news:> 3CDFA6E6.2090103@csical.com> …
Bill Caroselli (Q-TPS) wrote:So are you suggesting that Eclipse WILL work better with a mere 64 MB
of
RAM?Due to the nature of the beta agreement I can’t comment.
btw: I just recently bought a 256MB Registered ECC DDR DIMM for $99.00
at Fry’s (ram sure is cheap).Rennie