Do you plan to port DejaView to neutrino?
DejaView was never released on QNX4 because of legal issues.
Sadly, i guess this must apply to NTO as well.
“Alain Bonnefoy” <alain.bonnefoy@icbt.com> wrote in message
news:3A0906BA.3D6C67ED@icbt.com…
Do you plan to port DejaView to neutrino?
Mario Charest <mcharest@zinformatic.com> wrote:
DejaView was never released on QNX4 because of legal issues.
Sadly, i guess this must apply to NTO as well.
I have heard that DejaView will be ported to QNX Neutrino.
It seems we may have “friends” with larger patent libraries than
the owner of the patent that DejaView might have infringed who would
like to see a Dejaview for Neutrino, so it will likely happen. Don’t
know when, though.
-David
“Alain Bonnefoy” <> alain.bonnefoy@icbt.com> > wrote in message
news:> 3A0906BA.3D6C67ED@icbt.com> …
Do you plan to port DejaView to neutrino?
“David Gibbs” <dagibbs@qnx.com> wrote in message
news:8uc9m9$gcp$2@nntp.qnx.com…
Mario Charest <> mcharest@zinformatic.com> > wrote:
DejaView was never released on QNX4 because of legal issues.
Sadly, i guess this must apply to NTO as well.I have heard that DejaView will be ported to QNX Neutrino.
It seems we may have “friends” with larger patent libraries than
the owner of the patent that DejaView might have infringed who would
like to see a Dejaview for Neutrino, so it will likely happen. Don’t
know when, though.
Wow that’s very good news then!!! Does that mean it could be
release for QNX4 as well? Opps that’s not a techical topic ;-(
-David
“Alain Bonnefoy” <> alain.bonnefoy@icbt.com> > wrote in message
news:> 3A0906BA.3D6C67ED@icbt.com> …
Do you plan to port DejaView to neutrino?
Previously, Mario Charest wrote in qdn.public.qnxrtp.applications:
Wow that’s very good news then!!! Does that mean it could be
release for QNX4 as well? Opps that’s not a techical topic ;-(
This is good news indeed !
Unfortunately porting DejaView is a small amount of work, relative to instrumenting the kernel, and all the drivers; the real question is when will this be done for Neutrino ? (not really expecting an answer 
Rennie
Someone please tell me that “instrumenting the kernel, and all the drivers”
doesn’t imply any sort of execution speed penalty… I’d have to say that
if it did, I’m agin’ it.
-Warren
“Rennie Allen” <rallen@computermotion.com> wrote in message
news:Voyager.001114004336.983078A@rgallenqrtp.computermotion.com…
Previously, Mario Charest wrote in qdn.public.qnxrtp.applications:
Wow that’s very good news then!!! Does that mean it could be
release for QNX4 as well? Opps that’s not a techical topic ;-(This is good news indeed !
Unfortunately porting DejaView is a small amount of work, relative to
instrumenting the kernel, and all the drivers; the real question is when
will this be done for Neutrino ? (not really expecting an answer
Rennie
It will be two separate kernels - one fully instrumented and one not (or
just barely instrumented). I don’t know about drivers and don’t see a
reason why they should be different.
- igor
Warren Peece wrote:
Someone please tell me that “instrumenting the kernel, and all the drivers”
doesn’t imply any sort of execution speed penalty… I’d have to say that
if it did, I’m agin’ it.-Warren
“Rennie Allen” <> rallen@computermotion.com> > wrote in message
news:> Voyager.001114004336.983078A@rgallenqrtp.computermotion.com> …
Previously, Mario Charest wrote in qdn.public.qnxrtp.applications:
Wow that’s very good news then!!! Does that mean it could be
release for QNX4 as well? Opps that’s not a techical topic ;-(This is good news indeed !
Unfortunately porting DejaView is a small amount of work, relative to
instrumenting the kernel, and all the drivers; the real question is when
will this be done for Neutrino ? (not really expecting an answer >Rennie