When is this RT Linux orgasim going to end?

“Kevin Stallard” <kevin@ffflyingrobots.com> wrote in message
news:apni88$q9i$1@inn.qnx.com

This is your brain.

This is your brain on RT linux.

I forgot to mention discussion at russian community forum concerning the
matter:

http://qnx.org.ru/forum/viewtopic.php?topic=227&forum=5&show_all=1

I’m afraid many people will need some translator, because this discussion is
in Russian…

Maybe, this one allows you to catch the idea:

http://www.translate.ru/eng/srvurl.asp

Don’t forget to select Russian-English translation :slight_smile:

P.S. I tried that translator myself, it’s just a big fun :oD But this is
better translator I know :frowning:
Best regards,
Eduard.

I didn’t use pictures because they would be too graphic.

The number of people thinking about using RT linux in their next projects
is
much higher than I would have expected. The problems with it are so
obvious
that it is a wonder why people aren’t running from it.

The people who use RT linux successfully must be really good engineers, my
hat is off to them…but why use it? I don’t get it…

This link was on OS news as of today (Tuesday October 29th, 2002)

http://www.windowsfordevices.com./articles/AT7814535685.html


Kevin
\

“ed1k” <ed1k@nobody.fools.ca> wrote in message news:appgo0$5d2

Right now I have no computer… I have no even stereo… But good idea!
Excellent! I will try to put NT inside of my old “Zenit” camera > :slight_smile:

WOW!! Me got an old broken zenit too. I should try too. Or how about making
the first toaster running QNX :slight_smile:

Mario Charest wrote:

“Bill Caroselli (Q-TPS)” <> QTPS@EarthLink.net> > wrote in message
news:appa9f$rp7$> 1@inn.qnx.com> …

Does “these” include QNX. We used QNX4 very successfully.


Yes “these” includes QNX. The fact that you use it doesn’t change that I
wouldn’t > :wink:

Care to elaborate why you wouldn’t ? Gaming machines are
not exactly rocket science. I use QNX on much more challenging
applications…

Rennie

“Rennie Allen” <rallen@csical.com> wrote in message
news:3DC0DC0A.6070501@csical.com

Mario Charest wrote:
“Bill Caroselli (Q-TPS)” <> QTPS@EarthLink.net> > wrote in message
news:appa9f$rp7$> 1@inn.qnx.com> …

Does “these” include QNX. We used QNX4 very successfully.


Yes “these” includes QNX. The fact that you use it doesn’t change that
I
wouldn’t > :wink:

Care to elaborate why you wouldn’t ?

Not really.

Gaming machines are not exactly rocket science.
I use QNX on much more challenging applications…


Rennie

Care to elaborate why you wouldn’t ?

Not really.

Oh come on Mario… Please. :slight_smile:

I assume that we are talking the mall sort of video game machines. Is that
what you are thinking?

I am really curious as to your reasoning. I’m thinking that for gaming,
it’s the development tools and familiarity is the key thing. Thus using a
Windows version and the associated grapics environment 2D and 3D is going to
be hard to beat.

Besides, “hard real-time” is not at all critical. Even “soft real-time” is
pushing it - yes you want fast response times, but we are talking on the
order of 100 to 200 ms or so. That is the limit of human perception.

Besides, you can’t then “port” it to a CD and sell it mass market.

Mario, do you have other issues also?

Steve