Using PCMCIA IDE Flash with qnx4?

QNX Newsgroups (Archives) qnx.qnx4
41

On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 17:42:56 +0200, Jacek Rudnicki
<jacek.rudnicki@quantum.com.pl> wrote:

Hi Alex,

Some time ago I had a chance to test that chipset.
As I remember it was Realtek 8100C.

The Net.rtl driver easily handled it and the ‘show_pci’
command showed it Device ID as: 8139h.

Thanks Jacek, appreciated.

42

On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 14:38:44 +0200, Hugh Brown <hsbrown@qnx.com> wrote:

Hi Alex,
This chip is supposedly 8139 compatible, but we have not been able to
test
it with our driver

Hugh
thanks-I will post confirmation here soon!

\

Using Opera’s revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/

43

On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 17:42:56 +0200, Jacek Rudnicki
<jacek.rudnicki@quantum.com.pl> wrote:

Hi Alex,

Some time ago I had a chance to test that chipset.
As I remember it was Realtek 8100C.

The Net.rtl driver easily handled it and the ‘show_pci’
command showed it Device ID as: 8139h.

Thanks Jacek, appreciated.

44

On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 14:38:44 +0200, Hugh Brown <hsbrown@qnx.com> wrote:

Hi Alex,
This chip is supposedly 8139 compatible, but we have not been able to
test
it with our driver

Hugh
thanks-I will post confirmation here soon!

\

Using Opera’s revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/

45

On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 17:42:56 +0200, Jacek Rudnicki
<jacek.rudnicki@quantum.com.pl> wrote:

Hi Alex,

Some time ago I had a chance to test that chipset.
As I remember it was Realtek 8100C.

The Net.rtl driver easily handled it and the ‘show_pci’
command showed it Device ID as: 8139h.

Thanks Jacek, appreciated.

46

On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 14:38:44 +0200, Hugh Brown <hsbrown@qnx.com> wrote:

Hi Alex,
This chip is supposedly 8139 compatible, but we have not been able to
test
it with our driver

Hugh
thanks-I will post confirmation here soon!

\

Using Opera’s revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/

47

On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 17:42:56 +0200, Jacek Rudnicki
<jacek.rudnicki@quantum.com.pl> wrote:

Hi Alex,

Some time ago I had a chance to test that chipset.
As I remember it was Realtek 8100C.

The Net.rtl driver easily handled it and the ‘show_pci’
command showed it Device ID as: 8139h.

Thanks Jacek, appreciated.

48

On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 14:38:44 +0200, Hugh Brown <hsbrown@qnx.com> wrote:

Hi Alex,
This chip is supposedly 8139 compatible, but we have not been able to
test
it with our driver

Hugh
thanks-I will post confirmation here soon!

\

Using Opera’s revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/

49

On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 17:42:56 +0200, Jacek Rudnicki
<jacek.rudnicki@quantum.com.pl> wrote:

Hi Alex,

Some time ago I had a chance to test that chipset.
As I remember it was Realtek 8100C.

The Net.rtl driver easily handled it and the ‘show_pci’
command showed it Device ID as: 8139h.

Thanks Jacek, appreciated.

50

On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 14:38:44 +0200, Hugh Brown <hsbrown@qnx.com> wrote:

Hi Alex,
This chip is supposedly 8139 compatible, but we have not been able to
test
it with our driver

Hugh
thanks-I will post confirmation here soon!

\

Using Opera’s revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/

51

On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 17:42:56 +0200, Jacek Rudnicki
<jacek.rudnicki@quantum.com.pl> wrote:

Hi Alex,

Some time ago I had a chance to test that chipset.
As I remember it was Realtek 8100C.

The Net.rtl driver easily handled it and the ‘show_pci’
command showed it Device ID as: 8139h.

Thanks Jacek, appreciated.

52

On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 14:38:44 +0200, Hugh Brown <hsbrown@qnx.com> wrote:

Hi Alex,
This chip is supposedly 8139 compatible, but we have not been able to
test
it with our driver

Hugh
thanks-I will post confirmation here soon!

\

Using Opera’s revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/

53

On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 17:42:56 +0200, Jacek Rudnicki
<jacek.rudnicki@quantum.com.pl> wrote:

Hi Alex,

Some time ago I had a chance to test that chipset.
As I remember it was Realtek 8100C.

The Net.rtl driver easily handled it and the ‘show_pci’
command showed it Device ID as: 8139h.

Thanks Jacek, appreciated.

54

On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 14:38:44 +0200, Hugh Brown <hsbrown@qnx.com> wrote:

Hi Alex,
This chip is supposedly 8139 compatible, but we have not been able to
test
it with our driver

Hugh
thanks-I will post confirmation here soon!

\

Using Opera’s revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/

55

On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 17:42:56 +0200, Jacek Rudnicki
<jacek.rudnicki@quantum.com.pl> wrote:

Hi Alex,

Some time ago I had a chance to test that chipset.
As I remember it was Realtek 8100C.

The Net.rtl driver easily handled it and the ‘show_pci’
command showed it Device ID as: 8139h.

Thanks Jacek, appreciated.

56

On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 14:38:44 +0200, Hugh Brown <hsbrown@qnx.com> wrote:

Hi Alex,
This chip is supposedly 8139 compatible, but we have not been able to
test
it with our driver

Hugh
thanks-I will post confirmation here soon!

\

Using Opera’s revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/

57

On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 17:42:56 +0200, Jacek Rudnicki
<jacek.rudnicki@quantum.com.pl> wrote:

Hi Alex,

Some time ago I had a chance to test that chipset.
As I remember it was Realtek 8100C.

The Net.rtl driver easily handled it and the ‘show_pci’
command showed it Device ID as: 8139h.

Thanks Jacek, appreciated.

58

On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 14:38:44 +0200, Hugh Brown <hsbrown@qnx.com> wrote:

Hi Alex,
This chip is supposedly 8139 compatible, but we have not been able to
test
it with our driver

Hugh
thanks-I will post confirmation here soon!

\

Using Opera’s revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/

59

On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 17:42:56 +0200, Jacek Rudnicki
<jacek.rudnicki@quantum.com.pl> wrote:

Hi Alex,

Some time ago I had a chance to test that chipset.
As I remember it was Realtek 8100C.

The Net.rtl driver easily handled it and the ‘show_pci’
command showed it Device ID as: 8139h.

Thanks Jacek, appreciated.

60

Hello, how can I run Socklet and ifconfig when I have two ethernet cards ?

I run :

Net &
Net.ether2100 -l1 &
Net.ether2100 -l2 & ( or Net.rtl -l2 &)
…
Socklet hostname1 &

when I run
Socklet hostname2 &
I get
Socklet: unable to attach name: /qnx/socklet

Thanks
David