Voyager fails to complete pages

I’m new to QNX and couldn’t get it to run on my second hard drive (Linux does
but QNX won’t?) so I put it into W98.

I’ve noticed that Voyager runs very slowly and will often fail to download
pages completely. Is this a result of using QNX in W98 or does this happen to
people using QNX in its own partition?

Oddly enough the pages that Voyager seems to have the most trouble with are
the ones that QNX puts up! I’ve even had difficulty getting to them in W2K at
work.

I like the look of Voyager but I have to admit that I never thought I’d see a
browser that runs slower or fails to resolve than Net+ for BeOS. :wink:



Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

I’ve installed QNX on two different PCs with different hardware… Voyage
seems to run VERY fast - faster than any of my other browsers.

d


<oldelvis@my-deja.com> wrote in message news:8ri3q0$500$1@nnrp1.deja.com

I’m new to QNX and couldn’t get it to run on my second hard drive (Linux
does
but QNX won’t?) so I put it into W98.

I’ve noticed that Voyager runs very slowly and will often fail to download
pages completely. Is this a result of using QNX in W98 or does this happen
to
people using QNX in its own partition?

Oddly enough the pages that Voyager seems to have the most trouble with
are
the ones that QNX puts up! I’ve even had difficulty getting to them in W2K
at
work.

I like the look of Voyager but I have to admit that I never thought I’d
see a
browser that runs slower or fails to resolve than Net+ for BeOS. > :wink:



Sent via Deja.com > http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

“David DeMoss” <david@bulldogcapital.com> wrote:

I’ve installed QNX on two different PCs with different hardware… Voyage
seems to run VERY fast - faster than any of my other browsers.

d


oldelvis@my-deja.com> > wrote in message news:8ri3q0$500$> 1@nnrp1.deja.com> …
I’m new to QNX and couldn’t get it to run on my second hard drive (Linux
does
but QNX won’t?) so I put it into W98.

I’ve noticed that Voyager runs very slowly and will often fail to download
pages completely. Is this a result of using QNX in W98 or does this happen
to
people using QNX in its own partition?

Oddly enough the pages that Voyager seems to have the most trouble with
are
the ones that QNX puts up! I’ve even had difficulty getting to them in W2K
at
work.

I like the look of Voyager but I have to admit that I never thought I’d
see a
browser that runs slower or fails to resolve than Net+ for BeOS. > :wink:



Sent via Deja.com > http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

what processor speed? Mine runs on a p233 64mb of ram, not record breaking but
decnt, it seems about even with netscape on linux for me.

I have a FCPGA 566 and all my other OSes beat qnx for browsing. W2K is the
fastest.

I’m telling you that it rarely completes a lot of pages, particularly qnx’s
pages. No, Voyager is very slow.

In article Voyager.001007131149.737312E@dhcp,
Richard Stewart <aztec@our.net.au> wrote:

Previously, David DeMoss wrote in comp.os.qnx:
I’ve installed QNX on two different PCs with different hardware… Voyage
seems to run VERY fast - faster than any of my other browsers.

I have discovered the same thing - it is blindingly fast - it’s similar to using Opera compared to IE5.5 - very very fast…

A pity I don’t have the SSL verison…

Richard

Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

oldelvis@my-deja.com wrote:

I have a FCPGA 566 and all my other OSes beat qnx for browsing. W2K is the
fastest.

Don’t you mean that other browsers appear to be faster?


I’m telling you that it rarely completes a lot of pages, particularly qnx’s
pages. No, Voyager is very slow.

Have you taken into account the caching of pages by the browsers? (Try
shift-reload in Netscape for instance)

The biggest impact on browsing speed is the Internet connection between
your desktop and the server you’re connected to.

In article Voyager.001007131149.737312E@dhcp,
Richard Stewart <> aztec@our.net.au> > wrote:
Previously, David DeMoss wrote in comp.os.qnx:
I’ve installed QNX on two different PCs with different hardware… Voyage
seems to run VERY fast - faster than any of my other browsers.

I have discovered the same thing - it is blindingly fast - it’s similar to using Opera compared to IE5.5 - very very fast…

A pity I don’t have the SSL verison…

Richard



Sent via Deja.com > http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

As I said, it fails to complete pages. So couple a lack of speed with
the fact that it won’t complete them. It’s not an ISP issue. Every
OS/browser I have is faster.

On top of that I’ve noticed that while using Voyager my processor’s
temp will go from 85 degrees to 106 in a very short time. I’m guessing
that there’s a few bugs in Voyager or QNX with regards to FCPGA and VIA.

It’s a great looking OS but it’s just not working right with my setup.

In article <39E05A87.82972DA2@SPAM.REDIRECTED.TO.DEV.NULL>,
Rick Lake <rwlake@SPAM.REDIRECTED.TO.DEV.NULL> wrote:

oldelvis@my-deja.com > wrote:

I have a FCPGA 566 and all my other OSes beat qnx for browsing. W2K
is the
fastest.

Don’t you mean that other browsers appear to be faster?


I’m telling you that it rarely completes a lot of pages,
particularly qnx’s
pages. No, Voyager is very slow.

Have you taken into account the caching of pages by the browsers? (Try
shift-reload in Netscape for instance)

The biggest impact on browsing speed is the Internet connection
between
your desktop and the server you’re connected to.


In article Voyager.001007131149.737312E@dhcp,
Richard Stewart <> aztec@our.net.au> > wrote:
Previously, David DeMoss wrote in comp.os.qnx:
I’ve installed QNX on two different PCs with different
hardware… Voyage
seems to run VERY fast - faster than any of my other browsers.

I have discovered the same thing - it is blindingly fast - it’s
similar to using Opera compared to IE5.5 - very very fast…

A pity I don’t have the SSL verison…

Richard



Sent via Deja.com > http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.