Hello,
In my company, we want to begin developing in qnx, we know the advantages of
it.
But we have some doubts about select qnx neutrino or qnx 4 and the tools we
will need.
The hardware will be x86, we want to use TCP/IP, SQL and GUI.
I hope some one could help
Thanks in advance
Rafael Aiquel
aiquelr@telcel.net.ve
“Rafael Aiquel” <aiquelr@telcel.net.ve> wrote in message
news:998k2d$nqt$1@inn.qnx.com…
Hello,
In my company, we want to begin developing in qnx, we know the advantages
of
it.But we have some doubts about select qnx neutrino or qnx 4 and the tools
we
will need.The hardware will be x86, we want to use TCP/IP, SQL and GUI.
qnx4:
tcp/ip: tcpip runtime and development 4.25 (stable) or 5beta
sql: sybase sql anywhere 5.5 client/server
gui: photon 1.14B runtime/development
all has beed tested many times and works perfect.
nto2:
tcp/ip: almost the same, afaik 5b is aviable for nto2 too.
sql: Eempress, MySQL, PostgreSQL
gui: photon 2.x runtime/development
well, personally i havn’t tested all above for nto2 but folks told all works
also very well.
sure folks can greatly enlarge this lists.
i see only one disadvantage for nto2 case: lack of sybase sql server 
2all: btw buzz brought some news kind of sybase ported their sql anywhere
for nto2. can anybody confirm or disprove this info ?
I hope some one could help
Thanks in advance
Rafael Aiquel
aiquelr@telcel.net.ve
\
// wbr
“Rafael Aiquel” <aiquelr@telcel.net.ve> wrote in message
news:998k2d$nqt$1@inn.qnx.com…
Hello,
In my company, we want to begin developing in qnx, we know the advantages
of
it.But we have some doubts about select qnx neutrino or qnx 4 and the tools
we
will need.
I think the decision would need to be based on when you want to ship, and
what OS features you need. Given the features you state below and a ship
date in 12 months, I would think that neutrino is the way to go.
Rennie