is there such a thing?
Ulli
is there such a thing?
Ulli
Jens
“Ulrich Schemmel” <Ulrich.Schemmel@sohard.de> wrote in message
news:b1u1ti$eg0$1@inn.qnx.com…
is there such a thing?
Ulli
\
Ulrich Schemmel <Ulrich.Schemmel@sohard.de> wrote:
is there such a thing?
For which part?
chris
–
Chris McKillop <cdm@qnx.com> “The faster I go, the behinder I get.”
Software Engineer, QSSL – Lewis Carroll –
http://qnx.wox.org/
as far as I understand the “QNX functions” are manily POSIX
plus some QNX speciffic ones. So I need a Wrapper for both
parts. Photon is not needed in out project.
Ulli
“Jens H Jorgensen” <jhj@remove-nospam-videk.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:b1u74k$k2l$1@inn.qnx.com…
Wrapping what - Photon, Posix…?
Jens
“Ulrich Schemmel” <> Ulrich.Schemmel@sohard.de> > wrote in message
news:b1u1ti$eg0$> 1@inn.qnx.com> …
is there such a thing?Ulli
\
Jens
“Ulrich Schemmel” <Ulrich.Schemmel@sohard.de> wrote in message
news:b1vqr8$eik$1@inn.qnx.com…
as far as I understand the “QNX functions” are manily POSIX
plus some QNX speciffic ones. So I need a Wrapper for both
parts. Photon is not needed in out project.Ulli
“Jens H Jorgensen” <> jhj@remove-nospam-videk.com> > schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:b1u74k$k2l$> 1@inn.qnx.com> …
Wrapping what - Photon, Posix…?Jens
“Ulrich Schemmel” <> Ulrich.Schemmel@sohard.de> > wrote in message
news:b1u1ti$eg0$> 1@inn.qnx.com> …
is there such a thing?Ulli
\
I have a nice little wrapper for locking functions, and
I’ll make that available in a few weeks.
John Nagle
Animats
Jens H Jorgensen wrote:
I don’t think there are C++ wrapper for the QNX specific API - please
correct me if I am wrong. I do think I saw someone mention a wrapper which
will cover the Posix API - do a google search on Posix C++ wrapper, and I am
sure you will find something.Jens
“Ulrich Schemmel” <> Ulrich.Schemmel@sohard.de> > wrote in message
news:b1vqr8$eik$> 1@inn.qnx.com> …as far as I understand the “QNX functions” are manily POSIX
plus some QNX speciffic ones. So I need a Wrapper for both
parts. Photon is not needed in out project.Ulli
“Jens H Jorgensen” <> jhj@remove-nospam-videk.com> > schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:b1u74k$k2l$> 1@inn.qnx.com> …Wrapping what - Photon, Posix…?
Jens
“Ulrich Schemmel” <> Ulrich.Schemmel@sohard.de> > wrote in message
news:b1u1ti$eg0$> 1@inn.qnx.com> …is there such a thing?
Ulli
\
ACE contains wrappers for much of the POSIX stuff.
Have a look at (e.g.) http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE-overview.html
Disclaimer: We haven’t actually used ACE in production and make no claims
about efficiency. It compiles using the GNU libs but has some Dinkum issues.
Rob Rutherford
“John Nagle” <nagle@downside.com> wrote in message
news:3E44919C.8050304@downside.com…
I have a nice little wrapper for locking functions, and
I’ll make that available in a few weeks.John Nagle
AnimatsJens H Jorgensen wrote:
I don’t think there are C++ wrapper for the QNX specific API - please
correct me if I am wrong. I do think I saw someone mention a wrapper
which
will cover the Posix API - do a google search on Posix C++ wrapper, and
I am
sure you will find something.Jens
“Ulrich Schemmel” <> Ulrich.Schemmel@sohard.de> > wrote in message
news:b1vqr8$eik$> 1@inn.qnx.com> …as far as I understand the “QNX functions” are manily POSIX
plus some QNX speciffic ones. So I need a Wrapper for both
parts. Photon is not needed in out project.Ulli
“Jens H Jorgensen” <> jhj@remove-nospam-videk.com> > schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:b1u74k$k2l$> 1@inn.qnx.com> …Wrapping what - Photon, Posix…?
Jens
“Ulrich Schemmel” <> Ulrich.Schemmel@sohard.de> > wrote in message
news:b1u1ti$eg0$> 1@inn.qnx.com> …is there such a thing?
Ulli
\
“Ulrich Schemmel” <Ulrich.Schemmel@sohard.de> wrote in message
news:b1u1ti$eg0$1@inn.qnx.com…
is there such a thing?
Don’t know is it worth or not, but take a look at ACE:
http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE-overview.html
maybe, this is what you need ?
// wbr