We are seeing this on faster machines now, with QNX42.5 from the
June CD. In comp.os.qnx there were messages from Mario Charest and Pete
to the effect that there is a fixed version. Is this true? Where is it?
I’m not from QSSL quoting me is useless 
“Richard R. Kramer” <rrkramer@kramer-smilko.com> wrote in message
news:39CFDD2F.A0668DB@kramer-smilko.com…
We are seeing this on faster machines now, with QNX42.5 from the
June CD. In comp.os.qnx there were messages from Mario Charest and Pete
to the effect that there is a fixed version. Is this true? Where is it?
But your comments have helped many in the past.
KenR
Mario Charest wrote:
I’m not from QSSL quoting me is useless >
“Richard R. Kramer” <> rrkramer@kramer-smilko.com> > wrote in message
news:> 39CFDD2F.A0668DB@kramer-smilko.com> …
We are seeing this on faster machines now, with QNX42.5 from the
June CD. In comp.os.qnx there were messages from Mario Charest and Pete
to the effect that there is a fixed version. Is this true? Where is it?
Richard R. Kramer <rrkramer@kramer-smilko.com> wrote:
We are seeing this on faster machines now, with QNX42.5 from the
June CD. In comp.os.qnx there were messages from Mario Charest and Pete
to the effect that there is a fixed version. Is this true? Where is it?
I sent a note to QA to make sure they get a fixed Dev.par somewhere as
soon as possible.
Mario Charest wrote:
I’m not from QSSL quoting me is useless >
At least 50% right. Since you are usually quite close to 100%, I
counted on the authority of your comment to lend reasonablness to
my questions. Please don’t let your modesty screw up my strategy.
Richard
“Richard R. Kramer” <> rrkramer@kramer-smilko.com> > wrote in message
news:> 39CFDD2F.A0668DB@kramer-smilko.com> …
We are seeing this on faster machines now, with QNX42.5 from the
June CD. In comp.os.qnx there were messages from Mario Charest and Pete
to the effect that there is a fixed version. Is this true? Where is it?
“Richard R. Kramer” <rrkramer@kramer-smilko.com> wrote in message
news:39D14296.BB671569@kramer-smilko.com…
Mario Charest wrote:
I’m not from QSSL quoting me is useless >
At least 50% right. Since you are usually quite close to 100%, I
counted on the authority of your comment to lend reasonablness to
my questions. Please don’t let your modesty screw up my strategy.>
Well what I learned to do to not get myself in trouble or say stupid thing
is quote what a QSSL staffer said either here or in other places
I’m resisting with all my might to speculate, or talk about rumors.
Richard
“Richard R. Kramer” <> rrkramer@kramer-smilko.com> > wrote in message
news:> 39CFDD2F.A0668DB@kramer-smilko.com> …
We are seeing this on faster machines now, with QNX42.5 from the
June CD. In comp.os.qnx there were messages from Mario Charest and
Pete
to the effect that there is a fixed version. Is this true? Where is
it?
Mario Charest wrote:
“Richard R. Kramer” <> rrkramer@kramer-smilko.com> > wrote in message
news:> 39D14296.BB671569@kramer-smilko.com> …Mario Charest wrote:
I’m not from QSSL quoting me is useless >
At least 50% right. Since you are usually quite close to 100%, I
counted on the authority of your comment to lend reasonablness to
my questions. Please don’t let your modesty screw up my strategy.>
Well what I learned to do to not get myself in trouble or say stupid thing
is quote what a QSSL staffer said either here or in other places >
I’m resisting with all my might to speculate, or talk about rumors.Fair enough.
“Richard R. Kramer” <> rrkramer@kramer-smilko.com> > wrote in message
news:> 39CFDD2F.A0668DB@kramer-smilko.com> …
We are seeing this on faster machines now, with QNX42.5 from the
June CD. In comp.os.qnx there were messages from Mario Charest and
Pete
to the effect that there is a fixed version. Is this true? Where is
it?
Thank you very much.
Richard
pete@qnx.com wrote:
Richard R. Kramer <> rrkramer@kramer-smilko.com> > wrote:
We are seeing this on faster machines now, with QNX42.5 from the
June CD. In comp.os.qnx there were messages from Mario Charest and Pete
to the effect that there is a fixed version. Is this true? Where is it?I sent a note to QA to make sure they get a fixed Dev.par somewhere as
soon as possible.