Apache_1.3.17

QNX Newsgroups (Archives) qdn.public.qnx4
1

Hi,

I have a port of Apache_1.3.17 server running on QNX4.25D. It seems to work
well, but I’m interested in getting others to test it. The port supports
building with configure/make or bindist.sh. These means static modules may
be added to the server without too much drama.

Is there any internet site where I can upload this code??

Regards …

2

I think just about everybody does their own build. The code has evolved
to be quite portable and builds almost out of the box.

But you could try QSSL HQ. Check out their web site for the procedures.

regards,

rick

Richard Lyon wrote:

Hi,

I have a port of Apache_1.3.17 server running on QNX4.25D. It seems to work
well, but I’m interested in getting others to test it. The port supports
building with configure/make or bindist.sh. These means static modules may
be added to the server without too much drama.

Is there any internet site where I can upload this code??

Regards …

3

Hi,

The code is quite portable. I found a number of annoying modifications were
required with the build scripts.

Regards …

“Rick Lake” <rwlake@SPAM.REDIRECTED.TO.DEV.NULL> wrote in message
news:3A824F15.14193D0A@SPAM.REDIRECTED.TO.DEV.NULL…

I think just about everybody does their own build. The code has evolved
to be quite portable and builds almost out of the box.

But you could try QSSL HQ. Check out their web site for the procedures.

regards,

rick

Richard Lyon wrote:

Hi,

I have a port of Apache_1.3.17 server running on QNX4.25D. It seems to
work
well, but I’m interested in getting others to test it. The port supports
building with configure/make or bindist.sh. These means static modules
may
be added to the server without too much drama.

Is there any internet site where I can upload this code??

Regards …

4

Usually in cases like that, using a different shell (like “pdksh”)
helps.

Richard Lyon wrote:

Hi,

The code is quite portable. I found a number of annoying modifications were
required with the build scripts.

Regards …

“Rick Lake” <> rwlake@SPAM.REDIRECTED.TO.DEV.NULL> > wrote in message
news:> 3A824F15.14193D0A@SPAM.REDIRECTED.TO.DEV.NULL> …
I think just about everybody does their own build. The code has evolved
to be quite portable and builds almost out of the box.

But you could try QSSL HQ. Check out their web site for the procedures.

regards,

rick

Richard Lyon wrote:

Hi,

I have a port of Apache_1.3.17 server running on QNX4.25D. It seems to
work
well, but I’m interested in getting others to test it. The port supports
building with configure/make or bindist.sh. These means static modules
may
be added to the server without too much drama.

Is there any internet site where I can upload this code??

Regards …

5

Thanks, I’'l try that.

“Rick Lake” <rwlake@SPAM.REDIRECTED.TO.DEV.NULL> wrote in message
news:3A832D50.4048809@SPAM.REDIRECTED.TO.DEV.NULL…

Usually in cases like that, using a different shell (like “pdksh”)
helps.

Richard Lyon wrote:

Hi,

The code is quite portable. I found a number of annoying modifications
were
required with the build scripts.

Regards …

“Rick Lake” <> rwlake@SPAM.REDIRECTED.TO.DEV.NULL> > wrote in message
news:> 3A824F15.14193D0A@SPAM.REDIRECTED.TO.DEV.NULL> …
I think just about everybody does their own build. The code has
evolved
to be quite portable and builds almost out of the box.

But you could try QSSL HQ. Check out their web site for the
procedures.

regards,

rick

Richard Lyon wrote:

Hi,

I have a port of Apache_1.3.17 server running on QNX4.25D. It seems
to
work
well, but I’m interested in getting others to test it. The port
supports
building with configure/make or bindist.sh. These means static
modules
may
be added to the server without too much drama.

Is there any internet site where I can upload this code??

Regards …