Anyone using TCP/IP 5.0 in conjunction with Net.fd.
Any problem?
When I do, Net.fd sigsegv ;-(
- Mario
Anyone using TCP/IP 5.0 in conjunction with Net.fd.
Any problem?
When I do, Net.fd sigsegv ;-(
Mario,
I’ve been using 5.0 with Net.fd for a few weeks without any problem.
—Thom
Mario Charest wrote:
Anyone using TCP/IP 5.0 in conjunction with Net.fd.
Any problem?When I do, Net.fd sigsegv ;-(
- Mario
\
“Thom Skrtich” <thom@supertwist.net> wrote in message
news:3D39FF05.3010806@supertwist.net…
Mario,
I’ve been using 5.0 with Net.fd for a few weeks without any problem.
Ok thanks for the feedback.
Are you using it with the serial port?
—Thom
Mario Charest wrote:
Anyone using TCP/IP 5.0 in conjunction with Net.fd.
Any problem?When I do, Net.fd sigsegv ;-(
- Mario
\
No, with a wireless ethernet card.
—Thom
Mario Charest wrote:
“Thom Skrtich” <> thom@supertwist.net> > wrote in message
news:> 3D39FF05.3010806@supertwist.net> …
Mario,I’ve been using 5.0 with Net.fd for a few weeks without any problem.
Ok thanks for the feedback.Are you using it with the serial port?
—ThomMario Charest wrote:
Anyone using TCP/IP 5.0 in conjunction with Net.fd.
Any problem?When I do, Net.fd sigsegv ;-(
- Mario
\
“Thom Skrtich” <thom@supertwist.net> wrote in message
news:3D3B8B5F.4090906@supertwist.net…
No, with a wireless ethernet card.
Same here I just got a crash of Net.fd with TCP/IP 4.25.
Thanks again.
—Thom
Mario Charest wrote:
“Thom Skrtich” <> thom@supertwist.net> > wrote in message
news:> 3D39FF05.3010806@supertwist.net> …
Mario,I’ve been using 5.0 with Net.fd for a few weeks without any problem.
Ok thanks for the feedback.Are you using it with the serial port?
—ThomMario Charest wrote:
Anyone using TCP/IP 5.0 in conjunction with Net.fd.
Any problem?When I do, Net.fd sigsegv ;-(
- Mario
\