I get this from netinfo. What does this all mean? Is this normal?
15:55:23 0 Status 140 ( 35) NET logical node not in node map
15:55:23 0 Status 140 ( 7) NET ( tx) failed (vc_attach ctrl pkt)
15:55:23 0 Status 141 ( 35) NET logical node not in node map
15:55:23 0 Status 141 ( 7) NET ( tx) failed (vc_attach ctrl pkt)
15:55:23 0 Status 142 ( 35) NET logical node not in node map
15:55:23 0 Status 142 ( 7) NET ( tx) failed (vc_attach ctrl pkt)
15:55:23 0 Status 143 ( 35) NET logical node not in node map
15:55:23 0 Status 143 ( 7) NET ( tx) failed (vc_attach ctrl pkt)
15:55:24 0 Status 144 ( 35) NET logical node not in node map
15:55:24 0 Status 144 ( 7) NET ( tx) failed (vc_attach ctrl pkt)
15:55:24 0 Status 145 ( 35) NET logical node not in node map
15:55:24 0 Status 145 ( 7) NET ( tx) failed (vc_attach ctrl pkt)
15:55:24 0 Status 146 ( 35) NET logical node not in node map
15:55:24 0 Status 146 ( 7) NET ( tx) failed (vc_attach ctrl pkt)
15:55:24 0 Status 147 ( 35) NET logical node not in node map
15:55:24 0 Status 147 ( 7) NET ( tx) failed (vc_attach ctrl pkt)
15:55:24 0 Status 148 ( 35) NET logical node not in node map
15:55:24 0 Status 148 ( 7) NET ( tx) failed (vc_attach ctrl pkt)
15:55:24 0 Status 149 ( 35) NET logical node not in node map
15:55:24 0 Status 149 ( 7) NET ( tx) failed (vc_attach ctrl pkt)
15:55:24 0 Status 150 ( 35) NET logical node not in node map
15:55:24 0 Status 150 ( 7) NET ( tx) failed (vc_attach ctrl pkt)
15:55:25 1 00E029 754CEB (2707) tulip ( tx) timeout (no nack)
15:55:25 1 Status 0 (2707) tulip ( tx) timeout (no nack)
15:55:25 1 Status 29145 (2707) tulip ( tx) timeout (no nack)
15:55:25 1 Status 32768 (2707) tulip ( tx) timeout (no nack)
15:55:25 1 Status 1 (2707) tulip ( tx) timeout (no nack)
Doug Rixmann <rixmannd@rdsdata.com> wrote:
I get this from netinfo. What does this all mean? Is this normal?
15:55:23 0 Status 140 ( 35) NET logical node not in node map
15:55:23 0 Status 140 ( 7) NET ( tx) failed (vc_attach ctrl pkt)
You’ve got more licenses than you have nodes in your netmap.
15:55:25 1 00E029 754CEB (2707) tulip ( tx) timeout (no nack)
15:55:25 1 Status 0 (2707) tulip ( tx) timeout (no nack)
15:55:25 1 Status 29145 (2707) tulip ( tx) timeout (no nack)
15:55:25 1 Status 32768 (2707) tulip ( tx) timeout (no nack)
15:55:25 1 Status 1 (2707) tulip ( tx) timeout (no nack)
You tried to transmit to a down node.
-David
QNX Training Services
http://www.qnx.com/support/training/
Please followup in this newsgroup if you have further questions.
“David Gibbs” <dagibbs@qnx.com> wrote in message
news:b40fus$bob$1@nntp.qnx.com…
Doug Rixmann <> rixmannd@rdsdata.com> > wrote:
I get this from netinfo. What does this all mean? Is this normal?
15:55:23 0 Status 140 ( 35) NET logical node not in node map
15:55:23 0 Status 140 ( 7) NET ( tx) failed (vc_attach ctrl pkt)
You’ve got more licenses than you have nodes in your netmap.
- is this bad? what should I do to prevent this?
15:55:25 1 00E029 754CEB (2707) tulip ( tx) timeout (no nack)
15:55:25 1 Status 0 (2707) tulip ( tx) timeout (no nack)
15:55:25 1 Status 29145 (2707) tulip ( tx) timeout (no nack)
15:55:25 1 Status 32768 (2707) tulip ( tx) timeout (no nack)
15:55:25 1 Status 1 (2707) tulip ( tx) timeout (no nack)
You tried to transmit to a down node.
-David
QNX Training Services
http://www.qnx.com/support/training/
Please followup in this newsgroup if you have further questions.
Doug Rixmann <rixmannd@rdsdata.com> wrote:
“David Gibbs” <> dagibbs@qnx.com> > wrote in message
news:b40fus$bob$> 1@nntp.qnx.com> …
Doug Rixmann <> rixmannd@rdsdata.com> > wrote:
I get this from netinfo. What does this all mean? Is this normal?
15:55:23 0 Status 140 ( 35) NET logical node not in node map
15:55:23 0 Status 140 ( 7) NET ( tx) failed (vc_attach ctrl pkt)
You’ve got more licenses than you have nodes in your netmap.
- is this bad? what should I do to prevent this?
This is not bad. In fact, this is the cheap error-out – usually this
is caused by nameloc polling your network to see which nodes are up/down,
it tries to do a vc attach to each node, and Net says “that’s not in the
netmap”, and fails the request immediately. This is far less expensive
than having netmap entries for nodes that aren’t up/online, in which
case Net sends a packet, waits for ack/nack, retries a few times, then
gives up, generally with an error log like the second one you received.
The “-S” option to nameloc can space these out a bit more, but really
these aren’t a problem.
15:55:25 1 00E029 754CEB (2707) tulip ( tx) timeout (no nack)
15:55:25 1 Status 0 (2707) tulip ( tx) timeout (no nack)
15:55:25 1 Status 29145 (2707) tulip ( tx) timeout (no nack)
15:55:25 1 Status 32768 (2707) tulip ( tx) timeout (no nack)
15:55:25 1 Status 1 (2707) tulip ( tx) timeout (no nack)
You tried to transmit to a down node.
-David
QNX Training Services
http://www.qnx.com/support/training/
Please followup in this newsgroup if you have further questions.
David Gibbs <dagibbs@qnx.com> wrote:
This is not bad. In fact, this is the cheap error-out – usually this
is caused by nameloc polling your network to see which nodes are up/down,
it tries to do a vc attach to each node, and Net says “that’s not in the
netmap”, and fails the request immediately. This is far less expensive
than having netmap entries for nodes that aren’t up/online, in which
case Net sends a packet, waits for ack/nack, retries a few times, then
gives up, generally with an error log like the second one you received.
The “-S” option to nameloc can space these out a bit more, but really
these aren’t a problem.
Better yet, try the start_node_number (-s) and end_node_number (-e) to
nameloc. Also, in addition to slow_poll (-S) there is a poll_period
(-p) option to nameloc.
BUT. it is better to keep nameloc as fast and responsive so it can do
it’s job correctly, namely, name ergistration. To slow it down on
purpose will also slow down it’s responsiveness.
–
Bill Caroselli – Q-TPS Consulting
1-(626) 824-7983
qtps@earthlink.net