Alternative to Slinger Web Server (QNX 6)?

I recall hearing someone mention a web server ported
to QNX 6, but I cannot find the message describing it.

What is the port, and where can I find it?


Jeff Maass jmaass@columbus.rr.com Located near Columbus Ohio
USPSA # L-1192 NROI/CRO Amateur Radio K8ND
Maass’ IPSC Resources Page: http://home.columbus.rr.com/jmaass

Jeff Maass wrote:

I recall hearing someone mention a web server ported
to QNX 6, but I cannot find the message describing it.

What is the port, and where can I find it?

Check the newsgroups for Apache

Jutta

I have been working with slinger and learning all of its idosynchronicies.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of Apachie over slinger.


Bill Caroselli – 1(530) 510-7292
Q-TPS Consulting
QTPS@EarthLink.net


“Jutta Steinhoff” <j-steinhoff@web.de> wrote in message
news:3C0957A2.BAAC549D@web.de

Jeff Maass wrote:

I recall hearing someone mention a web server ported
to QNX 6, but I cannot find the message describing it.

What is the port, and where can I find it?


Check the newsgroups for Apache

Jutta

slinger has a smaller footprint and has the ds stuff for an easy method
of setting/getting simple data. It’ll probably work for many simple web
sites. Apache has a lot of extensions (modules) like secure connections,
integreated perl or php interpreters. It also supports user
login/password access type stuff and a whole lot more.

Bill Caroselli wrote:

I have been working with slinger and learning all of its idosynchronicies.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of Apachie over slinger.

Check the newsgroups for Apache

Jutta

Thanks for the info. Here’s a follow-up question. You mention secure
connections. I’m assuming that you mean https: type pages. I’m doing a
shopping cart app. After checking out we are planning to link to secure
credit card processor. Their server is secure. So far, nothing I see tells
me that slinger is inadaquite. If our pages are not secure pages, we don’t
need apachie. Is that correct?

On the other hand, if we do decide to use apachie, can I assume that all of
our cgi scripts will still work as is?


Bill Caroselli – 1(530) 510-7292
Q-TPS Consulting
QTPS@EarthLink.net


“David Hawley” <david.l.hawley@computer.org> wrote in message
news:3C0B0ACF.5080805@computer.org

slinger has a smaller footprint and has the ds stuff for an easy method
of setting/getting simple data. It’ll probably work for many simple web
sites. Apache has a lot of extensions (modules) like secure connections,
integreated perl or php interpreters. It also supports user
login/password access type stuff and a whole lot more.

Bill Caroselli wrote:

I have been working with slinger and learning all of its
idosynchronicies.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of Apachie over slinger.

Check the newsgroups for Apache

Jutta
\

Bill Caroselli wrote:

Thanks for the info. Here’s a follow-up question. You mention secure
connections. I’m assuming that you mean https: type pages. I’m doing a
shopping cart app. After checking out we are planning to link to secure
credit card processor. Their server is secure. So far, nothing I see tells
me that slinger is inadaquite. If our pages are not secure pages, we don’t
need apachie. Is that correct?

Yes


On the other hand, if we do decide to use apachie, can I assume that all of
our cgi scripts will still work as is?

Should be true.


Bill Caroselli – 1(530) 510-7292
Q-TPS Consulting
QTPS@EarthLink.net


“David Hawley” <> david.l.hawley@computer.org> > wrote in message
news:> 3C0B0ACF.5080805@computer.org> …

slinger has a smaller footprint and has the ds stuff for an easy method
of setting/getting simple data. It’ll probably work for many simple web
sites. Apache has a lot of extensions (modules) like secure connections,
integreated perl or php interpreters. It also supports user
login/password access type stuff and a whole lot more.

Bill Caroselli wrote:


I have been working with slinger and learning all of its

idosynchronicies.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of Apachie over slinger.

Check the newsgroups for Apache

Jutta

\

OK. I downloaded Apache from OSDN. The files in the archive were all
relitive (which I believe is a good thing). The seemed to touch on all
different first level directories so I installed in into my root dir ‘/’ so
that etc = /etc, etc.

Now i’m reading some of it’s docs. It implies that it should have its
config files in /usr/local/… but most of the config files (I think) went
into /etc/httpd.

Did I install this archive incorrectly?

Or, should I have installed from a different web site?


Bill Caroselli – 1(530) 510-7292
Q-TPS Consulting
QTPS@EarthLink.net

Hello, anyone?


Bill Caroselli – 1(530) 510-7292
Q-TPS Consulting
QTPS@EarthLink.net


“Bill Caroselli” <qtps@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:9ujcb6$erm$1@inn.qnx.com

OK. I downloaded Apache from OSDN. The files in the archive were all
relitive (which I believe is a good thing). The seemed to touch on all
different first level directories so I installed in into my root dir ‘/’
so
that etc = /etc, etc.

Now i’m reading some of it’s docs. It implies that it should have its
config files in /usr/local/… but most of the config files (I think) went
into /etc/httpd.

Did I install this archive incorrectly?

Or, should I have installed from a different web site?


Bill Caroselli – 1(530) 510-7292
Q-TPS Consulting
QTPS@EarthLink.net

I’ve always installed under “/usr/local/apache”, but I am using the version
provided by Empress with their RDBMS. I’m using their HTML toolkit to
retrieve data from their SQL database and display via web pages. It’s
pretty cool, but I am still writing scripts to update the database as I am
concerned about concurrent user access and the control the HTML tags give me
is insufficient.

Randy Aeberhardt
<raeberhardt@tantalus-systems.com>
<www.tantalus-systems.com>

“Bill Caroselli” <qtps@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:9ulgar$rnn$1@inn.qnx.com

Hello, anyone?


Bill Caroselli – 1(530) 510-7292
Q-TPS Consulting
QTPS@EarthLink.net


“Bill Caroselli” <> qtps@earthlink.net> > wrote in message
news:9ujcb6$erm$> 1@inn.qnx.com> …
OK. I downloaded Apache from OSDN. The files in the archive were all
relitive (which I believe is a good thing). The seemed to touch on all
different first level directories so I installed in into my root dir ‘/’
so
that etc = /etc, etc.

Now i’m reading some of it’s docs. It implies that it should have its
config files in /usr/local/… but most of the config files (I think)
went
into /etc/httpd.

Did I install this archive incorrectly?

Or, should I have installed from a different web site?


Bill Caroselli – 1(530) 510-7292
Q-TPS Consulting
QTPS@EarthLink.net

\