Cross compiling from Win32?

Bill_Caroselli1 · March 2, 2002, 6:04pm

“Kendall Bennett” <KendallB@scitechsoft.com> wrote in message >

BTW, it is possible to set up the 11.0c binary patch to be used for QNX4
development. It is a little involved because you need to use the 10.6
runtime libraries and headers, but it can be done. I don’t know how
stable it is though so I would recommend it until a few people get to
test it out some more >

I used to use the 11.0 beta. I don’t remember, did it support RTTI or some

subset of it? I could really use it for a new project I’m starting.

–
Bill Caroselli – 1(626) 824-7983
Q-TPS Consulting
QTPS@EarthLink.net

Bill_Caroselli1 · March 2, 2002, 6:07pm

I’m old enough to be rolling.

–
Bill Caroselli – 1(626) 824-7983
Q-TPS Consulting
QTPS@EarthLink.net

“Ian Cannon” <ianc@tecom.com.au> wrote in message
news:Voyager.020301085106.10082B@aresnode2.tecom.com.au…

Hey, I’m not that old…

Previously, Kris Warkentin wrote in qdn.public.qnxrtp.devtools:
“Kendall Bennett” <> KendallB@scitechsoft.com> > wrote in message

BTW, does anyone still use the MetroWerks tools on QNX 6? What about
Watcom? Would people be interested in using the Watcom compiler on QNX
6? I am the lead developer on the Open Watcom project so we would like
to support QNX6 if we can down the track >

I think you just made a bunch of old QNX 4 developers roll around on the
floor in religious ecstacy…

Kendall_Bennett · March 5, 2002, 7:59pm

In article <a5r3ln$153$1@inn.qnx.com>, qtps@earthlink.net says…

If I recall, Watcom C was $500 USD and C++ was another $500 USD list price.

Watcom 10.6 and 11.0 sold for $199 on the DOS/Win32 platforms, so I
guess the QNX versions were more expensive.

Regards,

Kendall_Bennett · March 5, 2002, 8:01pm

In article <a5r3qv$15f$1@inn.qnx.com>, qtps@earthlink.net says…

“Kendall Bennett” <> KendallB@scitechsoft.com> > wrote in message
BTW, it is possible to set up the 11.0c binary patch to be used for QNX4
development. It is a little involved because you need to use the 10.6
runtime libraries and headers, but it can be done. I don’t know how
stable it is though so I would recommend it until a few people get to
test it out some more >

I used to use the 11.0 beta. I don’t remember, did it support RTTI or some
subset of it? I could really use it for a new project I’m starting.

Yes, it has RTTI. It is not up to the ANSI C++ standards yet, but we
hope that once it is Open Source it will get there.

Regards,

Stephen_Howe · March 6, 2002, 8:42pm

“Bill Caroselli” <qtps@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:a5r3qv$15f$1@inn.qnx.com…

“Kendall Bennett” <> KendallB@scitechsoft.com> > wrote in message
BTW, it is possible to set up the 11.0c binary patch to be used for QNX4
development. It is a little involved because you need to use the 10.6
runtime libraries and headers, but it can be done. I don’t know how
stable it is though so I would recommend it until a few people get to
test it out some more >

I used to use the 11.0 beta. I don’t remember, did it support RTTI or
some
subset of it? I could really use it for a new project I’m starting.

It supports RTTI and dynamic_cast. 11.0 compared to 10.6 supports mutable,
explicit but not typename. It supports namespaces but there ae some subtle
namespace bugs in 11.0

Stephen Howe [TeamSybase]