GCC 3.2 is released. Anyone from QSSL willing to comment on when the
transtion from the 2.x gcc to 3.x series will be made (the C++ support
is much better in the 3.x series, which is why I ask). Up to this point
I have been in agreement with holding off; but with the 3rd release of
the 3.x series, I’m thinking it’s about time to make the leap.
Rennie
Rennie Allen <rallen@csical.com> wrote:
GCC 3.2 is released. Anyone from QSSL willing to comment on when the
transtion from the 2.x gcc to 3.x series will be made (the C++ support
is much better in the 3.x series, which is why I ask). Up to this point
I have been in agreement with holding off; but with the 3rd release of
the 3.x series, I’m thinking it’s about time to make the leap.Rennie
Mmmmmmmm, nice, stable C++ ABI.
I can’t comment on a schedule, but we are following the 3.x compiler,
and keeping it (and the issues it raises) in mind.
To: gcc-announce@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: GCC 3.2 Released
The GCC 3.2 release is now available, or making its way to,
the GNU FTP sites:
http://www.gnu.org/order/ftp.html
The purpose of this release is to provide a stable platform for
OS distributors to use building their next OS releases. A
primary objective was to stabilize the C++ ABI; we believe that
the interface to the compiler and the C++ standard library are
now stable.
There are almost no other bug-fixes or improvements in this
compiler, relative to GCC 3.1.1. Be aware that C++ code compiled
by GCC 3.2 will not interoperate with code compiled by GCC 3.1.1.
More detail about the release is available here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.2/changes.html
Many people contributed to this release – too many to name here!
Your Release Manager,
Colin Burgess ÐÉÛÅÔ:
Rennie Allen <> rallen@csical.com> > wrote:
GCC 3.2 is released. Anyone from QSSL willing to comment on when the
transtion from the 2.x gcc to 3.x series will be made (the C++ support
is much better in the 3.x series, which is why I ask). Up to this point
I have been in agreement with holding off; but with the 3rd release of
the 3.x series, I’m thinking it’s about time to make the leap.
Rennie
Mmmmmmmm, nice, stable C++ ABI.I can’t comment on a schedule, but we are following the 3.x compiler,
and keeping it (and the issues it raises) in mind.
Will it include ADA/Gnat support when released by QNX ? We are currently
working
on ADA/gnat from gcc-3.1 porting at qnx.org.ru.
Dmitry
Will it include ADA/Gnat support when released by QNX ? We are currently
working
on ADA/gnat from gcc-3.1 porting at qnx.org.ru.
I’m not aware of any plans to support ADA as yet.
On Fri, 16 Aug 2002 19:22:00 +0400, Dmitry Alexeyev <dmi@qnx.org.ru>
wrote:
Will it include ADA/Gnat support when released by QNX ? We are currently
working
on ADA/gnat from gcc-3.1 porting at qnx.org.ru.
Is it the one at ftp.qnx.org.ru/pub/projects/myst/testing?
ako
Dmitry
Andrzej Kocon ÐÉÛÅÔ:
On Fri, 16 Aug 2002 19:22:00 +0400, Dmitry Alexeyev <> dmi@qnx.org.ru
wrote:
Will it include ADA/Gnat support when released by QNX ? We are currently
working
on ADA/gnat from gcc-3.1 porting at qnx.org.ru.
Is it the one at ftp.qnx.org.ru/pub/projects/myst/testing?
ako
Yes.
Dmitry