This only affect the IDE running under Windows.
I’m running 6.2.1A (eval) on Windows-XP/Pro.
I have the CVS windows labels turned on.
After having modified several files in a project I right click on the
project and select Team->Commit.
After the commit has completed the ‘>’ indicators saying that the
files are different are not being updated (erased).
When running the IDE under self hosted QNX this works as expected.
I found that you need to do the Commit… in the Synchronize view. The
Commit… from the popup menu of the project name in the C/C++ Projects view
appears to do nothing. Selecting Commit… in the Synchronize view will
also ask you if you want to Add any new files to the repository.
I found this behavior all under QNX (no Windows).
– Celia
“Bill Caroselli” <qtps@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:bjpu5i$9cr$1@inn.qnx.com…
This only affect the IDE running under Windows.
I’m running 6.2.1A (eval) on Windows-XP/Pro.
I have the CVS windows labels turned on.
After having modified several files in a project I right click on the
project and select Team->Commit.After the commit has completed the ‘>’ indicators saying that the
files are different are not being updated (erased).When running the IDE under self hosted QNX this works as expected.
It appears that the IDE Outline view is NOT C++ aware.
It does not distinguish between methods with the same name but
different argument lists.
The first method shows up in the outline view and any subsequent
methods do not.
Even if they don’t show the argument lists, it would be nice to see
the multiple instances of the method name.
I am running 6.2.1B
–
Bill Caroselli – Q-TPS Consulting
1-(708) 308-4956 <== Note: New Number
qtps@earthlink.net
Bill Caroselli <qtps@earthlink.net> wrote:
: It appears that the IDE Outline view is NOT C++ aware.
: It does not distinguish between methods with the same name but
: different argument lists.
: The first method shows up in the outline view and any subsequent
: methods do not.
: Even if they don’t show the argument lists, it would be nice to see
: the multiple instances of the method name.
: I am running 6.2.1B
Noted.
It was corrected from the good folks at IBM/Rationale
(at least in the head branch).