as time goes by: phindows

QNX Newsgroups (Archives) qdn.public.qnx4.photon
1

Hi,

every year or so, we again would like to use phindows with qnx 4.2x / photon
1.1x.
But then we remember the font problem.

So here are my questions:
What’s new about that issue?
What’s about that ‘ghost’ phindows 2.0 version?
Should we burry our hopes on an usable phindows?

TIA

Friedhelm Schuetz
H.Kleinknecht & Co. GmbH

2

“Friedhelm Schütz” <Friedhelm.Schuetz@kleinknecht.de> wrote in message
news:adnma9$1mg$1@inn.qnx.com…

Hi,

every year or so, we again would like to use phindows with qnx 4.2x /
photon
1.1x.
But then we remember the font problem.

What font problem?

So here are my questions:
What’s new about that issue?
What’s about that ‘ghost’ phindows 2.0 version?
Should we burry our hopes on an usable phindows?

TIA

Friedhelm Schuetz
H.Kleinknecht & Co. GmbH

3

Hi Mario,

“Mario Charest” postmaster@l127.0.0.1 wrote in message
news:adnqdd$4mv$1@inn.qnx.com…

“Friedhelm Schütz” <> Friedhelm.Schuetz@kleinknecht.de> > wrote in message
news:adnma9$1mg$> 1@inn.qnx.com> …
Hi,

every year or so, we again would like to use phindows with qnx 4.2x /
photon
1.1x.
But then we remember the font problem.

What font problem?
Not all fonts used in photon are displayed from phindows.

That’s because of legal stuff, preventing the photon - phindows connection
to transport the used fonts to the windows machine.
The lookalike fonts installed on the windows machine are not used by
phindows.

So here are my questions:
What’s new about that issue?
What’s about that ‘ghost’ phindows 2.0 version?
Should we burry our hopes on an usable phindows?

TIA

Friedhelm Schuetz
H.Kleinknecht & Co. GmbH

\

4

ping

“Friedhelm Schütz” <Friedhelm.Schuetz@kleinknecht.de> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:adnma9$1mg$1@inn.qnx.com…

Hi,

every year or so, we again would like to use phindows with qnx 4.2x /
photon
1.1x.
But then we remember the font problem.

So here are my questions:
What’s new about that issue?
What’s about that ‘ghost’ phindows 2.0 version?
Should we burry our hopes on an usable phindows?

TIA

Friedhelm Schuetz
H.Kleinknecht & Co. GmbH

5

Sorry,

misplaced the ping in thread.

So here it comes:

Ping


“Friedhelm Schütz” <Friedhelm.Schuetz@kleinknecht.de> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:adnma9$1mg$1@inn.qnx.com…

Hi,

every year or so, we again would like to use phindows with qnx 4.2x /
photon
1.1x.
But then we remember the font problem.

So here are my questions:
What’s new about that issue?
What’s about that ‘ghost’ phindows 2.0 version?
Should we burry our hopes on an usable phindows?

TIA

Friedhelm Schuetz
H.Kleinknecht & Co. GmbH

6

Hey Friedhelm

Yes it does. I’m sorry, I meant to post to the entire newsgroup. My
suggestion to Friedhelm was that Phindows 2.0 now allowed you to set a
font mapping in the Phindows.ini file. The way that you would go about
this is:

[FontMapping]
dutchs=Times New Roman

If you wish to inquire about Phindows 2.0 please consult your sales rep.

Thanks,
Rodney

P.S. Freidhelm, did the email bounce back, or is it something with your
netwrok that doesn’t allow you to email that box?



Friedhelm Schütz wrote:

Thanks Rodney,

received your email, but wasn’t able to reply at > guisupport@qnx.com> , so I
take this way.

To make sure to be at the right way, one additional question:
Does Phindows 2.0 work with photon 1.14?

TIA
Friedhelm

“Friedhelm Schütz” <> Friedhelm.Schuetz@kleinknecht.de> > schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:adnma9$1mg$> 1@inn.qnx.com> …

Hi,

every year or so, we again would like to use phindows with qnx 4.2x /

photon

1.1x.
But then we remember the font problem.

So here are my questions:
What’s new about that issue?
What’s about that ‘ghost’ phindows 2.0 version?
Should we burry our hopes on an usable phindows?

TIA

Friedhelm Schuetz
H.Kleinknecht & Co. GmbH


\

7

Thanks Rodney,

received your email, but wasn’t able to reply at guisupport@qnx.com, so I
take this way.

To make sure to be at the right way, one additional question:
Does Phindows 2.0 work with photon 1.14?

TIA
Friedhelm

“Friedhelm Schütz” <Friedhelm.Schuetz@kleinknecht.de> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:adnma9$1mg$1@inn.qnx.com…

Hi,

every year or so, we again would like to use phindows with qnx 4.2x /
photon
1.1x.
But then we remember the font problem.

So here are my questions:
What’s new about that issue?
What’s about that ‘ghost’ phindows 2.0 version?
Should we burry our hopes on an usable phindows?

TIA

Friedhelm Schuetz
H.Kleinknecht & Co. GmbH

8

Hi Rodney,
“Rodney Dowdall” <guisupport@qnx.com> wrote news:3D09D78B.9020807@qnx.com…

P.S. Freidhelm, did the email bounce back, or is it something with your
netwrok that doesn’t allow you to email that box?

Your postmaster answered:

Your message

To: ‘Rodney Dowdall’

Subject: AW: as time goes by: phindows

Sent: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 11:24:58 -0400

did not reach the following recipient(s):

@R&D GUI Support on Fri, 14 Jun 2002 11:26:17 -0400

A restriction in the system prevented delivery of the message.

The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=us;a= ;p=qnx software

sys;l=NIMBUS0206141526LWKRBNNN

MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:QSSL:NIMBUS