Hi:
It seems that the USB DDK is aimed towards the host side implementation.
Is there any intention to do anything with peripheral side implementation?
Thanks
Lionel
==================================
As I understand it (and I don’t know a lot about it - just what I’ve read)
the whole point of the USB architecture is to make the peripheral side a
trivial implementation (by putting the vast majority of the responsibility
on the host side). I believe that you can buy low cost chips (couple of
bucks in qty) that implement the entire peripheral side protocol stack
on-chip. I would think that if you wanted to make a neutrino system look
like a peripheral device it should be a pretty simple driver to talk to the
chip (which does all the work) and really would not necessitate use of the
USB DDK at all.
“Lionel Johnson” ljohnson**nospam**@sterling1.com wrote in message
news:96k0s4$ma6$1@inn.qnx.com…
Hi:
It seems that the USB DDK is aimed towards the host side implementation.
Is there any intention to do anything with peripheral side implementation?Thanks
Lionel
Lionel Johnson ljohnson**nospam**@sterling1.com wrote:
Hi:
It seems that the USB DDK is aimed towards the host side implementation.
Correct.
Is there any intention to do anything with peripheral side implementation?
Not at this time.