The documentation page for PtPanelGroup says for Pt_ARG_PG_CURRENT_INDEX:
“The index of the currently selected panel, where 1 indicates the
first panel. You can set this resource to switch to another panel.”
The index for the first panel is actually 0.
I’m running 6.2.1B.
Please fix.
–
Bill Caroselli – Q-TPS Consulting
1-(708) 308-4956 <== Note: New Number
qtps@earthlink.net
Bill Caroselli <qtps@earthlink.net> wrote:
The documentation page for PtPanelGroup says for Pt_ARG_PG_CURRENT_INDEX:
“The index of the currently selected panel, where 1 indicates the
first panel. You can set this resource to switch to another panel.”The index for the first panel is actually 0.
Yup, that even seeems to contradict an earlier bit which says:
Panel indexes
Panels are indexed from 0 through n - 1, where n is the number of panels
managed by the PtPanelGroup.
(And, is completely un-natural in the world of C, unless you’re aboyd
numbering QNX nodes.)
I’ve PRed it.
Thanks for the report.
QNX Training Services
http://www.qnx.com/support/training/
Please followup in this newsgroup if you have further questions.
David Gibbs <dagibbs@qnx.com> wrote:
DG > Yup, that even seeems to contradict an earlier bit which says:
DG > Panel indexes
DG > Panels are indexed from 0 through n - 1, where n is the number of panels
DG > managed by the PtPanelGroup.
DG > (And, is completely un-natural in the world of C, unless you’re aboyd
DG > numbering QNX nodes.)
DG > I’ve PRed it.
DG > Thanks for the report.
Ah. Good old Andrew. How is he? Does anyone ever hear from him?
At least Bill Flowers pops his head in here ever few months or so.
It was Andrew Boyd that got me involved with QNX some 16 years ago.
We called with questions and he spent over two hours on the phone
with us. It was our dime but his time.
Over the years I must have gotten over 30 other companies involved
with QNX too.
Them was the good old days, when you could actually talk to a
developer!
“Bill Caroselli” <qtps@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:bkd81c$9qf$1@inn.qnx.com…
David Gibbs <> dagibbs@qnx.com> > wrote:
Them was the good old days, when you could actually talk to a
developer!
There are “small” OS company that can provide this kind of service to
customer in your range 
QNX programmer’s time is too valuable to be spend talking to you and me (at
the business level). But hey some of them post in here, so not all is lost
Bill Caroselli <qtps@earthlink.net> wrote:
David Gibbs <> dagibbs@qnx.com> > wrote:
Ah. Good old Andrew. How is he? Does anyone ever hear from him?
Doing fine, working on qnet. 6.3 qnet involved a lot of rewriting
and optimization by Andrew.
QNX Training Services
http://www.qnx.com/support/training/
Please followup in this newsgroup if you have further questions.
OH! That’s great to hear.
I thought that he had left QNX years ago.
David Gibbs <dagibbs@qnx.com> wrote:
DG > Bill Caroselli <qtps@earthlink.net> wrote:
Ah. Good old Andrew. How is he? Does anyone ever hear from him?
DG > Doing fine, working on qnet. 6.3 qnet involved a lot of rewriting
DG > and optimization by Andrew.
Bill Caroselli <qtps@earthlink.net> wrote:
OH! That’s great to hear.
I thought that he had left QNX years ago.
He had. Sometimes people return to the scene of the crime.
QNX Training Services
http://www.qnx.com/support/training/
Please followup in this newsgroup if you have further questions.