Voyager borged by NetFront

QNX Newsgroups (Archives) qdn.public.qnxrtp.advocacy
1

QNX Launches New Embedded Browser with ACCESS NetFront Technology
URL:http://www.qnx.com/news/pr/dec10_03_netfront.html
URL:http://www.access-us-inc.com/news/articles/12102003.asp

(Funny that the ACCESS HQ (http://www.access.co.jp/press/index.html)
has no press release about this)

NetFront is a good product, but
I’m bit disappointed that now another browser rendering engine
is going to disappear (which isn’t A Good Thing).

kabe
BTW current Voyager is already 2.11; what’s “QNX Voyager 2”?

2

<kabe@sra-tohoku.co.jp> wrote in message news:brbpd6$6p2$1@inn.qnx.com…

QNX Launches New Embedded Browser with ACCESS NetFront Technology
URL:> http://www.qnx.com/news/pr/dec10_03_netfront.html
URL:> http://www.access-us-inc.com/news/articles/12102003.asp

(Funny that the ACCESS HQ (> http://www.access.co.jp/press/index.html> )
has no press release about this)

NetFront is a good product, but
I’m bit disappointed that now another browser rendering engine
is going to disappear (which isn’t A Good Thing).

I am more concerned that another (good?) rendering engine will be borged by
Voyager’s rusty UI.

–
kabe
BTW current Voyager is already 2.11; what’s “QNX Voyager 2”?

LOL. They never could count right, did we all know.

3

In article <brejed$9dh$1@inn.qnx.com>, kovalenko@attbi.com says…

kabe@sra-tohoku.co.jp> > wrote in message news:brbpd6$6p2$> 1@inn.qnx.com> …
QNX Launches New Embedded Browser with ACCESS NetFront Technology
URL:> http://www.qnx.com/news/pr/dec10_03_netfront.html
URL:> http://www.access-us-inc.com/news/articles/12102003.asp

(Funny that the ACCESS HQ (> http://www.access.co.jp/press/index.html> )
has no press release about this)

NetFront is a good product, but
I’m bit disappointed that now another browser rendering engine
is going to disappear (which isn’t A Good Thing).

I am more concerned that another (good?) rendering engine will be borged by
Voyager’s rusty UI.

–
kabe
BTW current Voyager is already 2.11; what’s “QNX Voyager 2”?

LOL. They never could count right, did we all know.

When they have a product they confuse customers by giving different names for that product (RTP,
Neutrino 2, QNX Neutrino RTOS 6…). When they have a new product they continue to confuse customers
by giving the name of an old and different product for the new product. I guess it means “QNX
Voyager 2 version 1.0” for the new one and “QNX Voyager version 2.11” for current browser :slight_smile:
Eduard.

4

ed1k <ed1k@humber.bay> wrote:

ek > When they have a product they confuse customers by giving different names for that product (RTP,
ek > Neutrino 2, QNX Neutrino RTOS 6…). When they have a new product they continue to confuse customers
ek > by giving the name of an old and different product for the new product. I guess it means “QNX
ek > Voyager 2 version 1.0” for the new one and “QNX Voyager version 2.11” for current browser :slight_smile:
ek > Eduard.

And don’t we all notice how quick QSSL is to clarify things. ;~}

5

Heh, we’ve all just been calling it NetFront…first I heard of Voyager
2 was the same time you guys did…on OpenQNX…marketing again I guess.

Dave


Bill Caroselli wrote:

ed1k <> ed1k@humber.bay> > wrote:

ek > When they have a product they confuse customers by giving different names for that product (RTP,
ek > Neutrino 2, QNX Neutrino RTOS 6…). When they have a new product they continue to confuse customers
ek > by giving the name of an old and different product for the new product. I guess it means “QNX
ek > Voyager 2 version 1.0” for the new one and “QNX Voyager version 2.11” for current browser > :slight_smile:
ek > Eduard.

And don’t we all notice how quick QSSL is to clarify things. ;~}