All our own soft is 32-bit code.
What legacy programms in QNX v4.25G might want to have Slib16 in the boot-image?
Is it safe to omit Slib16 theese days?
Tony.
Tony <mts.spb.suxx@mail.ru> wrote:
All our own soft is 32-bit code.
What legacy programms in QNX v4.25G might want to have Slib16 in the boot-image?
Is it safe to omit Slib16 theese days?
Some of the QNX Windows servers are still 16-bit only (requiring
Slib16). That’s the only thing I can think of. (Well, unless
you explicitly run Dev16 or Dev16.ser or something like that.)
-David
Please follow-up to newsgroup, rather than personal email.
David Gibbs
QNX Training Services
dagibbs@qnx.com
On 7 Sep 2004 21:20:13 GMT, David Gibbs <dagibbs@qnx.com> wrote:
Some of the QNX Windows servers are still 16-bit only (requiring
Slib16). That’s the only thing I can think of. (Well, unless
you explicitly run Dev16 or Dev16.ser or something like that.)
Found yet another dependancies - both vedit and vp (vedit plus v5.16) fail without Slib16.
Tony.
On 7 Oct 2004 13:26:40 GMT, David Gibbs <dagibbs@qnx.com> wrote:
Yeah, its an old program too. I never used vedit (I’m a vi user from
way back), so didn’t think of it.
[offtopic]
Lucky you!
I just can’t imagine how to start using vi - it buffles me completely!
I’m too old to get used to it. For me - mqc rulezz!
Probably I have to look for some O’Reilly book on vi…
[/offtopic]
Tony.
Tony <mts.spb.suxx@mail.ru> wrote:
On 7 Sep 2004 21:20:13 GMT, David Gibbs <> dagibbs@qnx.com> > wrote:
Some of the QNX Windows servers are still 16-bit only (requiring
Slib16). That’s the only thing I can think of. (Well, unless
you explicitly run Dev16 or Dev16.ser or something like that.)Found yet another dependancies - both vedit and vp (vedit plus v5.16)
fail without Slib16.
Yeah, its an old program too. I never used vedit (I’m a vi user from
way back), so didn’t think of it.
-David
David Gibbs
QNX Training Services
dagibbs@qnx.com
Tony <mts.spb.suxx@mail.ru> wrote:
On 7 Oct 2004 13:26:40 GMT, David Gibbs <> dagibbs@qnx.com> > wrote:
Yeah, its an old program too. I never used vedit (I’m a vi user from
way back), so didn’t think of it.
[offtopic]
Lucky you!
Well, when I first had to choose an editor, it was on a 4.2BSD Vax
11/785 student system, with generally 5-30 users. I had a choice
of vi or emacs – with emacs, it was , swap, swap,
swap, swap, … swap, swap, swap some more, … letter appears on
screen. With vi I could type. I learnt vi.
I just can’t imagine how to start using vi - it buffles me completely!
Yeah, vi is a truly “Unix” editor – powerful but cryptic.
[/offtopic]
-David
David Gibbs
QNX Training Services
dagibbs@qnx.com