96 Digital i/O

Does anyone have experience with digital i/o products under QNX4.25 or RTP?
I need to add 96 digital i/o points to my controller and was wondering the
best method. PC bus card? Fieldbus based? Ethernet?

Vaughn Martin

Vaughn Martin wrote:

Does anyone have experience with digital i/o products under QNX4.25 or RTP?
I need to add 96 digital i/o points to my controller and was wondering the
best method. PC bus card?

A direckt IO card should be OK if the IO signals are very local distance
and it is ok for you to draw 96 wires to your PC :slight_smile:

Fieldbus based?

Would make sense if the IOs are distributed ans in a distange of range
of ~100 meters. The type of the fieldbus depends on the volume of your
data and the requested time resolution or response time.

A CAN master at frame level + appropriate IOs would be the cheapest
solution … if it fits to your requierements.

Ethernet?

Also possible. We are working just on the implementation of an EtherCAT
master. It is a ethernet (100Mb/s) based fieldbus with a ring topology
Scan time is less then 100 micro seconds … number of IO modules is
virtually unlimited (65k)

Prototype is allready working …

Regards

Armin Steinhoff

http://www.steinhoff-automation.com

PS: QNX4 and QNX6 are supported

Vaughn Martin

I have used RS485 distributed I/O many times and it works really well. Try
googling Nudam for more info. You will be able to get digital and analog I/O
as well as RS485 cards (ISA, PCI or external) which connect to a standard
RS232 port. You then only need to use standard QNS functions to access the
RS232 port

Ray

Armin Steinhoff <a-steinhoff@web.de> wrote in message
news:d3gf01$6kq$1@inn.qnx.com

Vaughn Martin wrote:
Does anyone have experience with digital i/o products under QNX4.25 or
RTP?
I need to add 96 digital i/o points to my controller and was wondering
the
best method. PC bus card?

A direckt IO card should be OK if the IO signals are very local distance
and it is ok for you to draw 96 wires to your PC > :slight_smile:

Fieldbus based?

Would make sense if the IOs are distributed ans in a distange of range
of ~100 meters. The type of the fieldbus depends on the volume of your
data and the requested time resolution or response time.

A CAN master at frame level + appropriate IOs would be the cheapest
solution … if it fits to your requierements.

Ethernet?

Also possible. We are working just on the implementation of an EtherCAT
master. It is a ethernet (100Mb/s) based fieldbus with a ring topology
Scan time is less then 100 micro seconds … number of IO modules is
virtually unlimited (65k)

Prototype is allready working …

Regards

Armin Steinhoff

http://www.steinhoff-automation.com

PS: QNX4 and QNX6 are supported

Vaughn Martin

I have used PCI I/O cards from http://www.accesio.com in a industrial
process application without any problem.

Regads

Oscar E. Soto Hinojosa

Control Adaptable SA de CV

Tel:+ 52 (81) 8399-0180
Fax:+ 52 (81) 8399-0162
Cel: +52 (81) 8396-6327
“Vaughn Martin” <vhmartin@vamcointernational.com> escribió en el mensaje
news:d3gdru$5v4$3@inn.qnx.com

Does anyone have experience with digital i/o products under QNX4.25 or
RTP?
I need to add 96 digital i/o points to my controller and was wondering the
best method. PC bus card? Fieldbus based? Ethernet?

Vaughn Martin