Out of print: Getting Started with QNX Neutrino 2; rights f

QNX Newsgroups (Archives) qnx.cafe
21

Kris Warkentin wrote:

John Nagle wrote:

For that matter, what Harman products
actually use QNX? Harman has several Windows CE products co-developed
with Microsoft, including the Take Control remote and
the Auto PC. HiQnet, Harman’s network control system
for pro audio, is Windows-based. But what uses QNX?


http://www.harmanbecker.com/harmanBecker/www_root/index2.jsp?language=US

I can’t find any reference to QNX there.

I put “QNX” in the search box there, and got back

Search Term: QNX
Your search did not match any documents!

John Nagle

22

Hi Kris…

A search for QNX on the Harman/Becker link below… gives you a
not-matched response. Too bad; hey have to update their database perhaps.

Regards…

Miguel.




Kris Warkentin wrote:

John Nagle wrote:


http://www.harmanbecker.com/harmanBecker/www_root/index2.jsp?language=US

cheers,

Kris

23

Kris Warkentin wrote:

John Nagle wrote:

Kris Warkentin wrote:

John Nagle wrote:

For that matter, what Harman products
actually use QNX? Harman has several Windows CE products co-developed
with Microsoft, including the Take Control remote and
the Auto PC. HiQnet, Harman’s network control system
for pro audio, is Windows-based. But what uses QNX?

You asked a question, I gave you an answer. The fact that you found
nothing on the website only means that I probably should have kept my
mouth shut, not that I’m wrong.

OK, I found it.

There’s a doctoral dissertation from the University of
Passau in Germany which mentions a joint development effort
of a finite-state machine generator for QNX in association
with Harman/Becker GmbH.

http://www.im.uni-passau.de/db/projekte?project=HarmanBecker1

There are also projects to develop “debug support for
embedded applications” and a “software quality monitoring
toolkit”.

That’s modestly encouraging. One of the big issues in
automotive systems right now is who’s responsible for system
level debugging. The component suppliers aren’t in a central
enough position, and the auto manufacturers don’t want to
debug their supplier’s code. That opens a window for
QNX, which has better isolation between components than
most comparable systems, allowing for easier blame management.

John Nagle

24

Hi Kris…

May not too evident, but every one in this NG wants QNX to succeed. What
I hear time and again is “how can we help? Help us help you!”



…off-topic… + musing…

…how’bout if Micro$oft one day realizes that CE can’t compete
technically, buys QNX from Harman for pocket change (say, $200M US),
decides to switch its embedded-OS to QNX, and then QNX becomes
‘de-facto’ RTOS because of massive M$ propaganda??

…nah, too much common sense… /done musing.



Regards…

Miguel.



Kris Warkentin wrote:

You asked a question, I gave you an answer. The fact that you found
nothing on the website only means that I probably should have kept my
mouth shut, not that I’m wrong. You were speculating as to which
divisions of Harman might have use for QNX technology and I showed you one.

cheers,

Kris

25

Miguel Simon wrote:

Hi Kris…

May not too evident, but every one in this NG wants QNX to succeed. What
I hear time and again is “how can we help? Help us help you!”



…off-topic… + musing…

…how’bout if Micro$oft one day realizes that CE can’t compete
technically, buys QNX from Harman for pocket change (say, $200M US),
decides to switch its embedded-OS to QNX, and then QNX becomes
‘de-facto’ RTOS because of massive M$ propaganda??

…nah, too much common sense… /done musing.

I’ve heard that QSSL management turned down a bid for
QNX years ago, when Microsoft was first developing Windows CE.

Now it’s probably too late.

Ask Encyclopedia Brittanica how this works. Microsoft
wanted to buy them. They turned Microsoft down. Microsoft
did Encarta. Years later, Brittanica approached Microsoft
again, and was told, by Gates, that their company now had
negative value. Their retail sales force had kept the company
from making encyclopedias a high-volume, low margin product,
and that dragged the whole company down.

You can still buy an Encyclopedia Brittanica in
print form, but nobody does. $1000 in print form,
$49.95 on DVD. They had to come down to Encarta’s price.

Then came Wikipedia. Brittanica finally went to a
free online service and had to give their core
product away. (http://www.britannica.com)
By then it was too late. Wikipedia gets more hits.


John Nagle
Downside

26

“John Nagle” <nagle@downside.com> wrote in message
news:d6itk9$bqr$1@inn.qnx.com…

Miguel Simon wrote:
Hi Kris…

May not too evident, but every one in this NG wants QNX to succeed. What
I hear time and again is “how can we help? Help us help you!”



…off-topic… + musing…

…how’bout if Micro$oft one day realizes that CE can’t compete
technically, buys QNX from Harman for pocket change (say, $200M US),
decides to switch its embedded-OS to QNX, and then QNX becomes ‘de-facto’
RTOS because of massive M$ propaganda??

…nah, too much common sense… /done musing.

I’ve heard that QSSL management turned down a bid for
QNX years ago, when Microsoft was first developing Windows CE.

And if they would have accepted the bid, I bet you would have posted that
QNX
sold its soul to the devil…

This is actually getting very boring, Most people here wouldn’t last a
week if they had to run a company the size of QNX, yet they really sound
like they do know the right way do to things, sigh!

Now it’s probably too late.


Ask Encyclopedia Brittanica how this works. Microsoft
wanted to buy them. They turned Microsoft down. Microsoft
did Encarta. Years later, Brittanica approached Microsoft
again, and was told, by Gates, that their company now had
negative value. Their retail sales force had kept the company
from making encyclopedias a high-volume, low margin product,
and that dragged the whole company down.

You can still buy an Encyclopedia Brittanica in
print form, but nobody does. $1000 in print form,
$49.95 on DVD. They had to come down to Encarta’s price.

And what’s wrong with that?

27

For what its worth, my sales person gives away copies of your book to
potential customers who have questions. They carry a number of copies of it
around with them…

Kevin

“Robert Krten” <rk@parse.com> wrote in message
news:d6fk12$q5d$1@inn.qnx.com…

Malte Mundt <> mmundt@qnx.de> > wrote:
If you had a flyer advertising the book, we could leave it at a customer
site after a visit, and include it when we send out our info folder.
There
wasn’t much advertisement for your great books, and I think it would be
a
pity if they were no longer available.

I think my German distributor, Steinhoff Automation, has exactly what you
are
looking for! Contact Jutta Steinhoff (> jutta@steinhoff.de> )…

The reason this was not done in the past is because I tried. I asked QNX
to
let me advertise by renting their mailing lists. Shot down.
I asked QNX to let me advertise by including flyers in the product boxes
going out of QNX. Nope. I asked QNX how a third party was supposed to
advertise to the customer base – nothing useful ever came out of this.
Hence
I gave up. Unfortunately, what became clear over time that QNX was just
not
interested in helping out small third-party vendors.

Cheers,
-RK

Malte

“Robert Krten” <> rk@parse.com> > schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:d6ff5o$mv2$> 1@inn.qnx.com> …
Malte Mundt <> mmundt@qnx.de> > wrote:
Why do not print another batch? Not enough interest?

Correct. Since posting this a few weeks ago, I’ve sold 2 books.
I figure the < 100 that are left are a year’s supply at this rate > :slight_smile:
In order to get a decent price on the printing, I would need to print
at least a run of 500.

Cheers,
-RK

“Robert Krten” <> rk@parse.com> > schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:d5qfh4$2hb$> 3@inn.qnx.com> …
The “Getting Started with QNX Neutrino 2” book is now out of
print,
there
are limited quantities (< 100) available through PARSE and
distribution.

If anyone is interested, rights (exclusive, all languages except
for
Japanese
and Russian) are available for sale, contact > rk@parse.com > for more
info.

Cheers,
-RK

[xpost to comp.os.qnx, qdn.cafe]

\

28

Mario Charest wrote:

And if they would have accepted the bid, I bet you would have posted that
QNX
sold its soul to the devil…

This is actually getting very boring, Most people here wouldn’t last a
week if they had to run a company the size of QNX, yet they really sound
like they do know the right way do to things, sigh!

Google back to the 1999-2000 timeframe when the complaint de jour was that
QSSL was “missing the boat” by not going public. The example often cited
was the 20 Billion dollar market cap. for Red Hat. Ah yes, the heady days
of irrational exuberance :wink:

Rennie

29

According to this logic, nobody should criticize government either, because
most people would not last a week in the position of let’s say a president.
Likewise, nobody should criticize a product because most people would not
come close to making something comparable.

This is fundamentally silly position - you criticize things by comaraing
things against their competition, not against yourself. And if you look at
the competition, QNX has been passed in recent years (in terms of market
penetration) by companies who used to be behind and did not have nearly long
enough head start. GreenHills comes to mind, and they are not even riding
the Linux wave while doing that, so this convinient excuse does not apply…

With all the talk of ‘best’ and ‘first’ this would seem a little odd, no?

– igor

“Rennie Allen” <rallen@csical.com> wrote in message
news:42921BB0.3060107@csical.com…

Mario Charest wrote:

And if they would have accepted the bid, I bet you would have posted that
QNX
sold its soul to the devil…

This is actually getting very boring, Most people here wouldn’t last a
week if they had to run a company the size of QNX, yet they really sound
like they do know the right way do to things, sigh!

Google back to the 1999-2000 timeframe when the complaint de jour was that
QSSL was “missing the boat” by not going public. The example often cited
was the 20 Billion dollar market cap. for Red Hat. Ah yes, the heady days
of irrational exuberance > :wink:

Rennie

30

Igor Kovalenko wrote:

This is fundamentally silly position - you criticize things by comaraing
things against their competition, not against yourself. And if you look at
the competition, QNX has been passed in recent years (in terms of market
penetration) by companies who used to be behind and did not have nearly long
enough head start. GreenHills comes to mind, and they are not even riding
the Linux wave while doing that, so this convinient excuse does not apply…

Wow. Now there is a cool paragraph. It starts with making the statement that
one should not compare a company against its competition (but -presumably- against
its own past performance), and then it ends by comparing a company with it’s
competition, and proposing this as evidence that said company is not performing :wink:

What is it ? Does the competion matter or not ?

I actually couldn’t care less, I was lampooning arm chair CEOs (not comparing
any company with any other company).

31

“Rennie Allen” <rallen@csical.com> wrote in message
news:429248FC.30503@csical.com…

Igor Kovalenko wrote:

This is fundamentally silly position - you criticize things by comaraing
things against their competition, not against yourself. And if you look
at the competition, QNX has been passed in recent years (in terms of
market penetration) by companies who used to be behind and did not have
nearly long enough head start. GreenHills comes to mind, and they are not
even riding the Linux wave while doing that, so this convinient excuse
does not apply…

Wow. Now there is a cool paragraph. It starts with making the statement
that
one should not compare a company against its competition (but -presumably-
against

You must be reading between the lines or have trouble with comprehension. I
don’t suspect the latter from you, but it makes one wonder…

– igor

32

“Igor Kovalenko” <kovalenko@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:d6ter2$5iu$1@inn.qnx.com…

According to this logic, nobody should criticize government either,
because most people would not last a week in the position of let’s say a
president. Likewise, nobody should criticize a product because most people
would not come close to making something comparable.

I’m criticizing the criticizer…

This is fundamentally silly position - you criticize things by comaraing
things against their competition, not against yourself. And if you look at
the competition, QNX has been passed in recent years (in terms of market
penetration) by companies who used to be behind and did not have nearly
long enough head start. GreenHills comes to mind, and they are not even
riding the Linux wave while doing that, so this convinient excuse does not
apply…

With all the talk of ‘best’ and ‘first’ this would seem a little odd, no?

– igor

“Rennie Allen” <> rallen@csical.com> > wrote in message
news:> 42921BB0.3060107@csical.com> …
Mario Charest wrote:

And if they would have accepted the bid, I bet you would have posted
that QNX
sold its soul to the devil…

This is actually getting very boring, Most people here wouldn’t last a
week if they had to run a company the size of QNX, yet they really sound
like they do know the right way do to things, sigh!

Google back to the 1999-2000 timeframe when the complaint de jour was
that
QSSL was “missing the boat” by not going public. The example often cited
was the 20 Billion dollar market cap. for Red Hat. Ah yes, the heady days
of irrational exuberance > :wink:

Rennie

33

Not to sound overly critical, but you know a thread’s getting old when
people start arguing about terminology, eh Mario?! ;v)

Mario Charest wrote:

“Igor Kovalenko” <> kovalenko@comcast.net> > wrote in message
news:d6ter2$5iu$> 1@inn.qnx.com> …

According to this logic, nobody should criticize government either,
because most people would not last a week in the position of let’s say a
president. Likewise, nobody should criticize a product because most people
would not come close to making something comparable.


I’m criticizing the criticizer…


This is fundamentally silly position - you criticize things by comaraing
things against their competition, not against yourself. And if you look at
the competition, QNX has been passed in recent years (in terms of market
penetration) by companies who used to be behind and did not have nearly
long enough head start. GreenHills comes to mind, and they are not even
riding the Linux wave while doing that, so this convinient excuse does not
apply…

With all the talk of ‘best’ and ‘first’ this would seem a little odd, no?

– igor

“Rennie Allen” <> rallen@csical.com> > wrote in message
news:> 42921BB0.3060107@csical.com> …

Mario Charest wrote:


And if they would have accepted the bid, I bet you would have posted
that QNX
sold its soul to the devil…

This is actually getting very boring, Most people here wouldn’t last a
week if they had to run a company the size of QNX, yet they really sound
like they do know the right way do to things, sigh!

Google back to the 1999-2000 timeframe when the complaint de jour was
that
QSSL was “missing the boat” by not going public. The example often cited
was the 20 Billion dollar market cap. for Red Hat. Ah yes, the heady days
of irrational exuberance > :wink:

Rennie


\

–
cburgess@qnx.com

34

“Colin Burgess” <cburgess@qnx.com> wrote in message
news:4292996A.4010504@qnx.com…

Not to sound overly critical, but you know a thread’s getting old when
people start arguing about terminology, eh Mario?! ;v)

Understood !!!

Mario Charest wrote:
“Igor Kovalenko” <> kovalenko@comcast.net> > wrote in message
news:d6ter2$5iu$> 1@inn.qnx.com> …

According to this logic, nobody should criticize government either,
because most people would not last a week in the position of let’s say a
president. Likewise, nobody should criticize a product because most
people would not come close to making something comparable.


I’m criticizing the criticizer…


This is fundamentally silly position - you criticize things by comaraing
things against their competition, not against yourself. And if you look
at the competition, QNX has been passed in recent years (in terms of
market penetration) by companies who used to be behind and did not have
nearly long enough head start. GreenHills comes to mind, and they are not
even riding the Linux wave while doing that, so this convinient excuse
does not apply…

With all the talk of ‘best’ and ‘first’ this would seem a little odd, no?

– igor

“Rennie Allen” <> rallen@csical.com> > wrote in message
news:> 42921BB0.3060107@csical.com> …

Mario Charest wrote:


And if they would have accepted the bid, I bet you would have posted
that QNX
sold its soul to the devil…

This is actually getting very boring, Most people here wouldn’t last
a week if they had to run a company the size of QNX, yet they really
sound like they do know the right way do to things, sigh!

Google back to the 1999-2000 timeframe when the complaint de jour was
that
QSSL was “missing the boat” by not going public. The example often
cited
was the 20 Billion dollar market cap. for Red Hat. Ah yes, the heady
days
of irrational exuberance > :wink:

Rennie





\

cburgess@qnx.com

35

Oh, sorry Mario I wasn’t actually getting at you in particular, I was
referring to the last few posts. :v)

And now, back to the game… :vD

Mario Charest wrote:

“Colin Burgess” <> cburgess@qnx.com> > wrote in message
news:> 4292996A.4010504@qnx.com> …

Not to sound overly critical, but you know a thread’s getting old when
people start arguing about terminology, eh Mario?! ;v)


Understood !!!


Mario Charest wrote:

“Igor Kovalenko” <> kovalenko@comcast.net> > wrote in message
news:d6ter2$5iu$> 1@inn.qnx.com> …


According to this logic, nobody should criticize government either,
because most people would not last a week in the position of let’s say a
president. Likewise, nobody should criticize a product because most
people would not come close to making something comparable.


I’m criticizing the criticizer…



This is fundamentally silly position - you criticize things by comaraing
things against their competition, not against yourself. And if you look
at the competition, QNX has been passed in recent years (in terms of
market penetration) by companies who used to be behind and did not have
nearly long enough head start. GreenHills comes to mind, and they are not
even riding the Linux wave while doing that, so this convinient excuse
does not apply…

With all the talk of ‘best’ and ‘first’ this would seem a little odd, no?

– igor

“Rennie Allen” <> rallen@csical.com> > wrote in message
news:> 42921BB0.3060107@csical.com> …


Mario Charest wrote:



And if they would have accepted the bid, I bet you would have posted
that QNX
sold its soul to the devil…

This is actually getting very boring, Most people here wouldn’t last
a week if they had to run a company the size of QNX, yet they really
sound like they do know the right way do to things, sigh!

Google back to the 1999-2000 timeframe when the complaint de jour was
that
QSSL was “missing the boat” by not going public. The example often
cited
was the 20 Billion dollar market cap. for Red Hat. Ah yes, the heady
days
of irrational exuberance > :wink:

Rennie



\

cburgess@qnx.com
\

–
cburgess@qnx.com

36

Hi Mario…

Mario Charest wrote:

I’m criticizing the criticizer…

Yup… I was wondering myself, but I am sure that every one got it now!

Regards…

Miguel.

37

I went to that url and did a site search for “qnx”, result:

Search Term: qnx Your search did not match any documents !

Am I missing something?

“Kris Warkentin” <kewarken@qnx.com> wrote in message
news:d6ii5g$3qn$1@inn.qnx.com…

John Nagle wrote:
For that matter, what Harman products
actually use QNX? Harman has several Windows CE products co-developed
with Microsoft, including the Take Control remote and
the Auto PC. HiQnet, Harman’s network control system
for pro audio, is Windows-based. But what uses QNX?

http://www.harmanbecker.com/harmanBecker/www_root/index2.jsp?language=US

cheers,

Kris

begin 666 blank.gif
M1TE&.#EA0!/<``,# P/__S/__F?__9O__,___/,,S/,F?,9O_,
M,,/^9__^9S/^9F?^99O^9,_^9/]F]FS/]FF?]F9O]F,]F/\S__\S MS/\SF?\S9O\S,_\S/`__`S/`F?`9O`,`,S__\S_S,S_F<S_9LS_ M,\S_,S,\S,S,S,F<S,9LS,\S,,R9_\R9S,R9F<R99LR9,\R9,QF\QF
MS,QFF<QF9LQF,\QF,PS_\PSS,PSF<PS9LPS,\PS,P_\PS,PF<P9LP M,\P``)G__YG_S)G_F9G_9IG_,YG_)G,_YG,S)G,F9G,9IG,YG,)F9_YF9 MS)F9F9F99IF9,YF9)EF_YEFS)EFF9EF9IEF,YEF)DS_YDSS)DSF9DS9IDS M,YDS)D_YDS)DF9D9ID,YD``&;__V;_S&;_F6;_9F;_,V;_&;,_V;,
MS&;,F6;,9F;,V;,&:9_V:9S&:9F6:99F:9,V:9&9F_V9FS&9FF69F9F9F
M,V9F&8S_V8SS&8SF68S9F8S,V8S&8_V8S&8F689F8,V8``#/__S/_ MS#/_F3/_9C/_,S/_#/,_S/,S#/,F3/,9C/,S/,#.9_S.9S#.9F3.99C.9 M,S.9#-F_S-FS#-FF3-F9C-F,S-F#,S_S,SS#,SF3,S9C,S,S,S#,_S,
MS#,F3,9C,,S,```#__P#_S #_F0#_9@#_,P#_``#,_P#,S #,F0#,9@#, M,P#,``"9_P"9S "9F0"99@"9,P"9``!F_P!FS !FF0!F9@!F,P!F```S_PS
MS SF0S9@S,PS_P``S ``F0``9@``,^X``-T``+L``*H``(@``'<` M`%4``$0``"(``!$```#N``#=``"[``"J``"(``!W``!5``!$```B```1
M[@W0NPJ@B =P501 (@$>[N[MW=W;N[NZJJJHB(B'=W J=U55541$1"(B(A$1$0```"'Y! $`````+ `````!$0 @$``$$! [
`
end

begin 666 blank.gif
M1TE&.#EA0!/<``,# P/__S/__F?__9O__,___/,,S/,F?,9O_,
M,,/^9__^9S/^9F?^99O^9,_^9/]F]FS/]FF?]F9O]F,]F/\S__\S MS/\SF?\S9O\S,_\S/`__`S/`F?`9O`,`,S__\S_S,S_F<S_9LS_ M,\S_,S,\S,S,S,F<S,9LS,\S,,R9_\R9S,R9F<R99LR9,\R9,QF\QF
MS,QFF<QF9LQF,\QF,PS_\PSS,PSF<PS9LPS,\PS,P_\PS,PF<P9LP M,\P``)G__YG_S)G_F9G_9IG_,YG_)G,_YG,S)G,F9G,9IG,YG,)F9_YF9 MS)F9F9F99IF9,YF9)EF_YEFS)EFF9EF9IEF,YEF)DS_YDSS)DSF9DS9IDS M,YDS)D_YDS)DF9D9ID,YD``&;__V;_S&;_F6;_9F;_,V;_&;,_V;,
MS&;,F6;,9F;,V;,&:9_V:9S&:9F6:99F:9,V:9&9F_V9FS&9FF69F9F9F
M,V9F&8S_V8SS&8SF68S9F8S,V8S&8_V8S&8F689F8,V8``#/__S/_ MS#/_F3/_9C/_,S/_#/,_S/,S#/,F3/,9C/,S/,#.9_S.9S#.9F3.99C.9 M,S.9#-F_S-FS#-FF3-F9C-F,S-F#,S_S,SS#,SF3,S9C,S,S,S#,_S,
MS#,F3,9C,,S,```#__P#_S #_F0#_9@#_,P#_``#,_P#,S #,F0#,9@#, M,P#,``"9_P"9S "9F0"99@"9,P"9``!F_P!FS !FF0!F9@!F,P!F```S_PS
MS SF0S9@S,PS_P``S ``F0``9@``,^X``-T``+L``*H``(@``'<` M`%4``$0``"(``!$```#N``#=``"[``"J``"(``!W``!5``!$```B```1
M[@W0NPJ@B =P501 (@$>[N[MW=W;N[NZJJJHB(B'=W J=U55541$1"(B(A$1$0```"'Y! $`````+ `````!$0 @$``$$! [
`
end

38

Go to the site of a company that builds planes and search for the OS they
use on their aircraft. What do you find?
Go to a site of a ship builder and search for the OS they use on their
ships, i.e. for radar systems. What do you find?
Go to a site of a medical devices supplier and search for the OS they use on
their devices. What do you find?

Does a bell ring now?


“Dean Douthat” <deanz1@comcast.net> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:d78ak6$9h5$1@inn.qnx.com…

I went to that url and did a site search for “qnx”, result:

Search Term: qnx Your search did not match any documents !

Am I missing something?

“Kris Warkentin” <> kewarken@qnx.com> > wrote in message
news:d6ii5g$3qn$> 1@inn.qnx.com> …
John Nagle wrote:
For that matter, what Harman products
actually use QNX? Harman has several Windows CE products co-developed
with Microsoft, including the Take Control remote and
the Auto PC. HiQnet, Harman’s network control system
for pro audio, is Windows-based. But what uses QNX?

http://www.harmanbecker.com/harmanBecker/www_root/index2.jsp?language=US

cheers,

Kris

39

“Malte Mundt” <mmundt@qnx.de> wrote in message
news:d7ej59$p2c$1@inn.qnx.com…

Go to the site of a company that builds planes and search for the OS they
use on their aircraft. What do you find?

GreenHill :wink:

Go to a site of a ship builder and search for the OS they use on their
ships, i.e. for radar systems. What do you find?

WindRiver :wink:

Go to a site of a medical devices supplier and search for the OS they use
on
their devices. What do you find?

You might find QNX there indeed. To be specific, QNX4.

Does a bell ring now?

People may withhold this information for different reasons. It could be that
the OS in question is simply not a selling point of such a device. Or it
could be that they are embarrassed :wink:

“Dean Douthat” <> deanz1@comcast.net> > schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:d78ak6$9h5$> 1@inn.qnx.com> …
I went to that url and did a site search for “qnx”, result:

Search Term: qnx Your search did not match any documents !

Am I missing something?

“Kris Warkentin” <> kewarken@qnx.com> > wrote in message
news:d6ii5g$3qn$> 1@inn.qnx.com> …
John Nagle wrote:
For that matter, what Harman products
actually use QNX? Harman has several Windows CE products co-developed
with Microsoft, including the Take Control remote and
the Auto PC. HiQnet, Harman’s network control system
for pro audio, is Windows-based. But what uses QNX?

http://www.harmanbecker.com/harmanBecker/www_root/index2.jsp?language=US

cheers,

Kris

\

40

Yes, but QNX’s support for the third party vendor is less than nill. They
actually run interference.

“Steve Reid” <stever@sreid.ott.qnx.com> wrote in message
news:d6g251$78i$1@inn.qnx.com…

Robert Krten <> rk@parse.com> > wrote:
The reason this was not done in the past is because I tried. I asked
QNX to
let me advertise by renting their mailing lists. Shot down.
I asked QNX to let me advertise by including flyers in the product boxes
going out of QNX. Nope. I asked QNX how a third party was supposed to
advertise to the customer base – nothing useful ever came out of this.
Hence
I gave up. Unfortunately, what became clear over time that QNX was just
not
interested in helping out small third-party vendors.

For what it’s worth, we do include your sample chapters in the online
docs.

Steve Reid > stever@qnx.com
TechPubs (Technical Publications)
QNX Software Systems